|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Analysis of national and single-center incidence and survival after liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma. New trends and future opportunities显示文摘 | Ruy J. Cruz Sarangarajan Ranganathan George Mazariegos Kyle Soltys Navdeep Nayyar Qing Sun Geoffrey Bond Peter H. Shaw Kimberly Haberman Lakshmanan Krishnamurti Abhinav Humar Rakesh Sindhi | 2012 | Surgery2012，，： | 2 |
| 2 | Laparoscopic stapled left lateral segment liver resection—Technique and results显示文摘 | Bradley C. Linden M.D. Abhinav Humar M.D. F.R.C.S.(C.) Timothy D. Sielaff M.D. Ph.D. F.A.C.S | 2003 | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2003，，6： | 1 |
| 3 | Lessons Learned From More Than 1,000 Pancreas Transplants at a Single Institution显示文摘 | David E. R. Sutherland Rainer W. G. Gruessner David L. Dunn Arthur J. Matas Abhinav Humar Raja Kandaswamy S. Michael Mauer William R. Kennedy Frederick C. Goetz R. Paul Robertson Angelika C. Gruessner John S. Najarian | 2001 | Annals of Surgery2001，，4： | 1 |
| 4 | Robotic total pancreatectomy with or without autologous islet cell transplantation: replication of an open technique through a minimal access approach显示文摘 | Amer H. Zureikat Trang Nguyen Brian A. Boone Martin Wijkstrom Melissa E. Hogg Abhinav Humar Herbert Zeh | 2015 | Surgical Endoscopy2015，，1： | 1 |
| 5 | Laparoscopic stapled left lateral segment liver resection—technique and results显示文摘 | Bradley C Linden Abhinav Humar Timothy D Sielaff | 2003 | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2003，，6： | 1 |
| 6 | Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as a Bridge to Liver Transplantation: A Single-Institution Experience显示文摘 | Samer Tohme Daniel Sukato Hui-Wei Chen Nikhil Amesur Albert B. Zajko Abhinav Humar David A. Geller James W. Marsh Allan Tsung | 2013 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology2013，，： | 1 |
| 7 | Role of tacrolimus prolonged release in the prevention of allograft rejection显示文摘 | Peter Abrams Abhinav Humar Henkie P Tan | 2010 | Transplant Research and Risk Management2010，2，8： | 1 |
| 8 | Pancreas after kidney transplants显示文摘 | Abhinav Humar Thiagarajan Ramcharan Raja Kandaswamy | 2001 | Am J Sur2001，182，： | 1 |
| 9 | Outcomes of curative treatment for hepatocellular cancer in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease显示文摘 | Srinevas K. Reddy Jennifer L. Steel Hui‐Wei Chen David J. DeMateo Jon Cardinal Jaideep Behari Abhinav Humar J. Wallis Marsh David A. Geller Allan Tsung | 2012 | Hepatology2012，，6： | 1 |
| 10 | Chronic rejection: the next major challenge for pancreas transplant recipients显示文摘 | Abhinav Humar Khalid Khwaja Thiagarajan Ramcharan Massimo Asolati Raja Kandaswamy Rainer W. G. Gruessner David E. R. Sutherland Angelika C. Gruessner | 2003 | Transplantation2003，，6： | 1 |
| 11 | Liver retransplants using living donors:An approach for management显示文摘Background and aims:Many centers do not offer living donor transplants for patients in need of a liver retransplant.We aimed to study our liver retransplant outcomes using living donors and compared them with those of retransplants performed using deceased donors.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed all retransplants performed at our center between 2009 and 2023,and outcomes of living donor retransplants were compared with deceased donor retransplants using standard statistical tests.Results:Between January 2009 and March 2023,a total of 77 retransplants,60 with deceased donors and 17 with living donors,were performed.Important demographic differences between the two groups included a higher model for end-stage liver disease score in the deceased donor group(32.1±6.1 vs.19.4±5.7,P<0.001)and a higher number of early retransplants(within 3 months of the initial transplant),which accounted for 35% of deceased donor transplants but 0 of living donor transplants(P<0.01).Overall,the patient and graft survival rates were comparable between the two groups.The patient survival rates at 1 and 3 years after transplant were 73% and 67% in the deceased donor group and 84% and 73% in the living donor group,respectively(P=0.57).The hospital length of stay and blood product use were both better in the living donor group.Biliary complications did not show significant different between the two groups(P=0.33).Conclusions:Living donors can provide acceptable outcomes for those in need of a retransplant,with results comparable to those seen with deceased donors.A systematic approach to the patient in the pre-,peri-,and post-transplantation period is important in these complicated cases. | Hasan Al Harakeh Christopher Hughes Amit Tevar Vikram Gunabushanam Eishan Ashwat Hao Liu Abhinav Humar | 2023 | Liver Research2023，7，3： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员