|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | A multiple center survey on the in clinical practice of noninvasive ventilation as a first - line intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome 显示文摘 | Massimo antonelli Giorgio Conti Antonio Esquinas | 2007 | Critical Care Medcine2007，35，： | 1 |
| 2 | Usefulness of transcranial echography in patients with decompressive craniectomy: A comparison with computed tomography scan*显示文摘 | Anselmo Caricato Vittorio Mignani Maria Grazia Bocci Mariano Alberto Pennisi Claudio Sandroni Alessandra Tersali Alessandra Antonaci Chiara de Waure Massimo Antonelli | 2012 | Critical Care Medicine2012，，6： | 1 |
| 3 | Noninvasive versus invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure in patients with hematologic malignancies:a 5-year muhicenter observational survey显示文摘 | Gristina Giuseppe R Antonelli Massimo Conti Giorgio | 2011 | Critical Care Medicine2011，39，10： | 1 |
| 4 | Noninvasive vs invasive ventilation in COPD patients with severe acute respiratory failure deemed to require ventilatory assistance显示文摘 | Enzo Squadrone Pamela Frigerio Claudio Fogliati Cesare Gregoretti Giorgio Conti Massimo Antonelli Roberta Costa Paola Baiardi Paolo Navalesi | 2004 | Intensive Care Medicine2004，，7： | 1 |
| 5 | Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2009: I. Pneumonia and infections, sepsis, outcome, acute renal failure and acid base, nutrition and glycaemic control显示文摘 | Massimo Antonelli Elie Azoulay Marc Bonten Jean Chastre Giuseppe Citerio Giorgio Conti Daniel Backer Fran?ois Lemaire Herwig Gerlach Goran Hedenstierna Michael Joannidis Duncan Macrae Jordi Mancebo Salvatore M. Maggiore Alexandre Mebazaa Jean-Charles Prei | 2010 | Intensive Care Medicine2010，，2： | 1 |
| 6 | Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project)显示文摘 | Andrea Minervini Giampaolo Siena Alessandro Antonelli Giampaolo Bianchi Aldo Massimo Bocciardi Sergio Cosciani Cunico Vincenzo Ficarra Cristian Fiori Ferdinando Fusco Andrea Mari Giuseppe Martorana Mauro Medica Vincenzo Mirone Giuseppe Morgia Francesco Po | 2014 | World Journal of Urology2014，，1： | 1 |
| 7 | A Comparison of Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation and ConventionalMechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure显示文摘 | Giorgio Coot i Monica Roeeo | 1998 | N Engl J Med1998，339，： | 1 |
| 8 | Ventilator-associated pneumonia: current status and future recommendations显示文摘 | Shai Efrati MD Israel Deutsch BSc Massimo Antonelli MD Peter M. Hockey MD Ronen Rozenblum PhD MPH Gabriel M. Gurman MD | 2010 | Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing2010，，2： | 1 |
| 9 | Echography in brain imaging in intensive care unit: State of the art显示文摘Transcranial sonography(TCS)is an ultrasound-based imaging technique,which allows the identification of several structures within the brain parenchyma.In the past it has been applied for bedside assessment of different intracranial pathologies in children.Pres-ently,TCS is also used on adult patients to diagnose intracranial space occupying lesions of various origins,intracranial hemorrhage,hydrocephalus,midline shift and neurodegenerative movement disorders,in both acute and chronic clinical settings.In comparison with conventional neuroimaging methods(such as com-puted tomography or magnetic resonance),TCS has the advantages of low costs,short investigation times,repeatability,and bedside availability.These noninva-sive characteristics,together with the possibility of of-fering a continuous patient neuro-monitoring system,determine its applicability in the monitoring of multiple emergency and non-emergency settings.Currently,TCS is a still underestimated imaging modality that requires a wider diffusion and a qualified training process.In this review we focused on the main indications of TCSfor the assessment of acute neurologic disorders in in-tensive care unit. | Anselmo Caricato Sara Pitoni Luca Montini Maria Grazia Bocci Pina Annetta Massimo Antonelli | 2014 | World Journal of Radiology2014，6，9： | 1 |
| 10 | A multiple-center survey on the use in clinical practice of noninvasive ventilation as a first-line intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome 显示文摘 | Massimo Antonelli Giorgio Conti Antonio Esquinas | 2007 | Critic Care Med2007，35，： | 1 |
| 11 | A comparison of noninvasive positivepressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure 显示文摘 | Massimo Antonelli Giorgio Conti | 1998 | N Engl J Med1998，339，7： | 1 |
| 12 | Noninvasive vs invasive ventilation in COPD patients with severe acute respiratory failure deemed to require ventilatory assistance显示文摘 | Enzo Squadrone Pamela Frigerio Claudio Fogliati Cesare Gregoretti Giorgio Conti Massimo Antonelli Roberta Costa Paola Baiardi Paolo Navalesi | 2004 | Intensive Care Medicine2004，，7： | 1 |
| 13 | Noninvasive versus conventional ventilation to treat hypercapnic encephalopathy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease显示文摘 | Raffaele Scala Stefano Nava Giorgio Conti Massimo Antonelli Mario Naldi Ivano Archinucci Giovanni Coniglio Nicholas S. Hill | 2007 | Intensive Care Medicine2007，，12： | 1 |
| 14 | COVID-19 pandemic in the intensive care unit:Psychological implications and interventions,a systematic review显示文摘BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic produced changes in intensive care units(ICUs) in patient care and health organizations. The pandemic event increased patients’ risk of developing psychological symptoms during and after hospitalisation. These consequences also affected those family members who could not access the hospital. In addition, the initial lack of knowledge about the virus and its management, the climate of fear and uncertainty, the increased workload and the risk of becoming infected and being contagious, had a strong impact on healthcare staff and organizations. This highlighted the importance of interventions aimed at providing psychological support to ICUs, involving patients, their relatives, and the staff;this might involve the reorganisation of the daily routine and rearrangement of ICU staff duties.AIM To conduct a systematic review of psychological issues in ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic involving patients, their relatives, and ICU staff.METHODS We investigated the PubMed and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases and found 65 eligible articles,upon which we commented.RESULTS Our results point to increased perceived stress and psychological distress in staff, patients and their relatives and increased worry for being infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in patients and relatives. Furthermore, promising results were obtained for some psychological programmes aiming at improving psychological measures in all ICU categories.CONCLUSION As the pandemic limited direct inter-individual interactions, the role of interventions using digital tools and virtual reality is becoming increasingly important. All considered, our results indicate an essential role for psychologists in ICUs. | Laura Monti Elisa Marconi Maria Grazia Bocci Georgios Demetrios Kotzalidis Marianna Mazza Carolina Galliani Sara Tranquilli Giovanni Vento Giorgio Conti Gabriele Sani Massimo Antonelli Daniela Pia Rosaria Chieffo | 2023 | World Journal of Psychiatry2023，13，4： | 0 |
| 15 | Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients with pancreatic infection显示文摘Background:The AbSeS-classification defines specific phenotypes of patients with intra-abdominal infection based on the(1)setting of infection onset(community-acquired,early onset,or late-onset hospital-acquired),(2)presence or absence of either localized or diffuse peritonitis,and(3)severity of disease expression(infection,sepsis,or septic shock).This classification system demonstrated reliable risk stratification in intensive care unit(ICU)patients with intra-abdominal infection.This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of ICU patients with pancreatic infection and assess the relationship between the components of the AbSeS-classification and mortality.Methods:This was a secondary analysis of an international observational study(“AbSeS”)investigating ICU patients with intra-abdominal infection.Only patients with pancreatic infection were included in this analysis(n=165).Mortality was defined as ICU mortality within 28 days of observation for patients discharged earlier from the ICU.Relationships with mortality were assessed using logistic regression analysis and reported as odds ratio(OR)and 95%confidence interval(CI).Results:The overall mortality was 35.2%(n=58).The independent risk factors for mortality included older age(OR=1.03,95%CI:1.0 to 1.1 P=0.023),localized peritonitis(OR=4.4,95%CI:1.4 to 13.9 P=0.011),and persistent signs of inflammation at day 7(OR=9.5,95%CI:3.8 to 23.9,P<0.001)or after the implementation of additional source control interventions within the first week(OR=4.0,95%CI:1.3 to 12.2,P=0.013).Gramnegative bacteria were most frequently isolated(n=58,49.2%)without clinically relevant differences in microbial etiology between survivors and non-survivors.Conclusions:In pancreatic infection,a challenging source/damage control and ongoing pancreatic inflammation appear to be the strongest contributors to an unfavorable short-term outcome.In this limited series,essentials of the AbSeS-classification,such as the setting of infection onset,diffuse peritonitis,and severity of disease expression,were not associated with an increased mortality risk. | Marie Dejonckheere Massimo Antonelli Kostoula Arvaniti Koen Blot Ben CreaghBrown Dylan Wde Lange Jan De Waele Mieke Deschepper Yalim Dikmen George Dimopoulos Christian Eckmann Guy Francois Massimo Girardis Despoina Koulenti Sonia Labeau Jeffrey Lipman Fernando Lipovestky Emilio Maseda Philippe Montravers Adam Mikstacki JoseArtur Paiva Cecilia Pereyra Jordi Rello JeanFrancois Timsit Dirk Vogelaers Stijn Blot the Abdominal Sepsis Study(AbSeS)group on behalf of the Trials Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine | 2024 | Journal of Intensive Medicine2024，4，1： | 0 |
| 16 | Liver biopsy:analysis of results of two specialist teams显示文摘AIM:To analyze the safety and the adequacy of a sample of liver biopsies(LB)obtained by gastroenterologist(G)and interventional radiologist(IR)teams.METHODS:Medical records of consecutive patients evaluated at our GI unit from 01/01/2004 to31/12/2010 for whom LB was considered necessary to diagnose and/or stage liver disease,both in the setting of day hospital and regular admission(RA) care,were retrieved and the data entered in a database.Patients were divided into two groups:one undergoing an ultrasonography(US)-assisted procedure by the G team and one undergoing US-guided biopsy by the IR team.For the first group,an intercostal approach(US-assisted) and a Menghini modified type needle 16 G(length 90 mm) were used.The IR team used a subcostal approach(US-guided) and a semiautomatic modified Menghini type needle 18 G(length 150 mm).All the biopsies were evaluated for appropriateness according to the current guidelines.The number of portal tracts present in each biopsy was assessed by a revision performed by a single pathologist unaware of the previous pathology report.Clinical,laboratory and demographic patient characteristics,the adverse events rate and the diagnostic adequacy of LB were analyzed.RESULTS:During the study period,226 patients,126 males(56%) and 100 females(44%),underwent LB:167(74%) were carried out by the G team,whereas 59(26%) by the IR team.LB was mostly performed in a day hospital setting by the G team,while IR completed more procedures on inpatients(P < 0.0001).The groups did not differ in median age,body mass index(BMI),presence of comorbidities and coagulation parameters.Complications occurred in 26 patients(16 G team vs 10 IR team,P = 0.15).Most gross samples obtained were considered suitable for basal histological evaluation,with no difference among the two teams(96.4% G team vs 91.5% IR,P = 0.16).However,the samples obtained by the G team had a higher mean number of portal tracts(G team 9.5 ± 4.8; range 1-29 vs IR team 7.8 ± 4.1; range 1-20)(P = 0.0192) and a longer mean length(G team 22 mm ± 8.8 vs IR team 15 ± 6.5 mm)(P = 0.0001).CONCLUSION:LB can be performed with similar outcomes both by G and IR.Use of larger dimension needles allows obtaining better samples,with a similar rate of adverse events. | Giulia Anania Elia Gigante Matteo Piciucchi Emanuela Pilozzi Eugenio Pucci Adriano Maria Pellicelli Carlo Capotondi Michele Rossi Flavia Baccini Giulio Antonelli Paola Begini Gianfranco Delle Fave Massimo Marignani | 2014 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology2014，5，2： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员