|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Postoperative ileus: Impact of pharmacological treatment,laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery pathways显示文摘Almost all patients develop postoperative ileus (POI) after abdominal surgery.POI represents the single largest factor influencing length of stay (LOS) after bowel resection,and has great implications for patients and resource utilization in health care.New methods to treat and decrease the length of POI are therefore of great importance.During the past decade,a substantial amount of research has been performed evaluating POI,and great progress has been made in our understanding and treatment of POI.Laparoscopic procedures,enhanced recovery pathways and pharmacologic treatment have been introduced.Each factor has substantially contributed to decreasing the length of POI and thus LOS after bowel resection.This editorial outlines resource utilization of POI,normal physiology of gut motility and pathogenesis of POI.Pharmacological treatment,fast track protocols and laparoscopic surgery can each have significant impact on pathways causing POI.The optimal integration of these treatment options continues to be assessed in prospective studies. | Knut Magne Augestad Conor P Delaney | 2010 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2010，16，17： | 33 |
| 2 | Colorectal cancer surveillance:What's new and what's next?显示文摘The accumulated evidence from two decades of randomized controlled trials has not yet resolved the question of how best to monitor colorectal cancer(CRC)survivors for early detection of recurrent and metachronous disease or even whether doing so has its intended effect.A new wave of trial data in the coming years and an evolving knowledge of relevant biomarkers may bring us closer to understanding what surveillance strategies are most effective for a given subset of patients.To best apply these insights,a number of important research questions need to be addressed,and new decision making tools must be developed.In this review,we summarize available randomized controlled trial evidence comparing alternative surveillance testing strategies,describe ongoing trials in the area,and compare professional society recommendations for surveillance.In addition,we discuss innovations relevant to CRC surveillance and outline a research agenda which will inform a more risk-stratified and personalized approach to follow-up. | Johnie Rose Knut Magne Augestad Gregory S Cooper | 2014 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2014，20，8： | 3 |
| 3 | International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer显示文摘 | Augestad KM Lindsetomo RO Reynolds H | | American Journal of Surgery0，，： | 2 |
| 4 | International preoperative rectal cancer management:staging,neoadjuvant treatment,and impact of multidisciplinary teams显示文摘 | Augestad KM Lindsetmo RO Stulberg J | 2010 | World J Surg2010，34，11： | 1 |
| 5 | Data-driven ap- proach for assessing utility of medical tests usingelectronic medical records显示文摘 | Skrvseth S O Augestad K M Ebadollabi S | 2015 | Journal of Biomedical Informatics2015，53，2： | 1 |
| 6 | Internationaltrends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer显示文摘 | Augestad KM Lindsetmo RO Reynolds H | | 0，，03： | 1 |
| 7 | International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer显示文摘 | Knut M. Augestad Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo Harry Reynolds Jonah Stulberg Anthony Senagore Brad Champagne Alexander G. Heriot Fabien Leblanc Conor P. Delaney | 2011 | The American Journal of Surgery2011，，3： | 1 |
| 8 | International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer显示文摘 | Augestad KM Lindsetmo RO Reynolds H | 2011 | Am J Surg2011，201，35： | 1 |
| 9 | International Preoperative Rectal Cancer Management: Staging, Neoadjuvant Treatment, and Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams显示文摘 | Knut M. Augestad Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo Jonah Stulberg Harry Reynolds Anthony Senagore Brad Champagne Alexander G. Heriot Fabien Leblanc Conor P. Delaney | 2010 | World Journal of Surgery2010，，11： | 1 |
| 10 | Isokinetic muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction显示文摘 | Osteras H Augestad L Tondel S | 1998 | Scand J Med Sci Sports1998，8，5： | 1 |
| 11 | The one-stop trial:does electronic referral and booking by the general practitioner (GPs)to outpatient day case surgery reduce waiting time and costs?a randomized controlled trial protocol显示文摘 | Augestad K M Revhaug A Vonen B | 2008 | BMC Surgery2008，，： | 1 |
| 12 | Overcoming Distance: Video-Conferencing as a Clinical and Educational Tool Among Surgeons显示文摘 | Knut Magne Augestad Rolv Ole Lindsetmo | 2009 | World Journal of Surgery2009，，7： | 1 |
| 13 | International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer 显示文摘 | Augestad K M Lindsetmo R 0 Reynolds H | 2011 | Am J Surg2011，201，3： | 1 |
| 14 | International preoperative rectal cancer management: staging, neoadjuvant treatment, and impact of multidisciplinary teams 显示文摘 | Augestad KM Lindsetmo RO Stulberg J | 2010 | World J Surg2010，34，11： | 1 |
| 15 | Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses显示文摘 | Augestad LB Diderichsen J | 2006 | Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen2006，126，15： | 1 |
| 16 | Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: An emerging technology显示文摘Laparoscopy, minimally invasive and minimal access surgery with more surgeons performing these ad-vanced procedures. We highlight in the review several key emerging technologies such as the telementor-ing and virtual reality simulators, that provide a solid ground for delivering surgical education to rural area and allow young surgeons a safety net and confidence while operating on a newly learned technique. | Etai M Bogen Knut M Augestad Hiten RH Patel Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo | 2014 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2014，6，5： | 0 |
| 17 | Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review显示文摘Most patients treated with curative intent for colorectal cancer(CRC) are included in a follow-up program involving periodic evaluations. The survival benefits of a follow-up program are well delineated, and previous meta-analyses have suggested an overall survival improvement of 5%-10% by intensive follow-up. However, in a recent randomized trial, there was no survival benefit when a minimal vs an intensive follow-up program was compared. Less is known about the potential side effects of follow-up. Well-known side effects of preventive programs are those of somatic complications caused by testing, negative psychological conse-quences of follow-up itself, and the downstream impact of false positive or false negative tests. Accordingly, the potential survival benefits of CRC follow-up must be weighed against these potential negatives. The present review compares the benefits and side effects of CRC follow-up, and we propose future areas for research. | Knut Magne Augestad Johnie Rose Benjamin Crawshaw Gregory Cooper Conor Delaney | 2014 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology2014，6，5： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员