|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Laparoscopic staging in hilar cholangiocarcinoma:Is it still justified?显示文摘Radical resection remains the only potential curative therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma(HCCA).The aim of staging laparoscopic(SL) is to identify patients with previously undetected advanced disease who will not benefit from surgical palliation and therefore avoid unnecessary laparotomies.The accuracy of non-invasive imaging techniques has significantly improved during the last years.As a consequence,the diagnostic yield of SL of biliary tract malignancy should have decreased proportionally.At the same time,some authors have recently questioned the value of laparoscopic ultrasound(LUS) as a complement of SL.In this setting,the precise role of SL and LUS in the preoperative workup of HCCA remains unclear.As it seems undoubtedly clear that its efficacy has decreased in the last decades,there is a general consensus that the universal use of SL shouldn't be recommended anymore;SL should be performed only in selected patients with higher risk of holding unresectable disease(T2/T3 or Bismuth type 3/4 and patients with suspicion of metastases).It would also be recommended in patients with potentially resectable disease who would need preoperative invasive procedures.Finally,SL should be performed preceding laparotomy in one session.Further studies on the benefit of SL and LUS in this subset of HCCA patients are warranted. | Fernando Rotellar Fernando Pardo | 2013 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology2013，5，7： | 4 |
| 2 | A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy显示文摘 | Fernando Rotellar Fernando Pardo Alberto Benito Pablo Martí-Cruchaga Gabriel Zozaya Nicolás Pedano | 2012 | Surgical Endoscopy2012，，9： | 2 |
| 3 | Partial liver volume radioembolization induces hypertrophy in the spared hemiliver and no major signs of portal hypertension显示文摘 | Nerea Fernández‐Ros Nuno Silva Jose Ignacio Bilbao Mercedes I?arrairaegui Alberto Benito Delia D’Avola Macarena Rodriguez Fernando Rotellar Fernando Pardo Bruno Sangro | 2014 | HPB2014，，3： | 1 |
| 4 | Surgical treatment of persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (PHH) (insulinoma and nesidioblastosis)显示文摘 | Daniel Casanova Manuel G. Polavieja Angel Naranjo Fernando Pardo Fernando Rotellar Francisco Gonzalez Cristina Luzuriaga Sara Rega?o Julio Freijanes | 2007 | Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery2007，，6： | 1 |
| 5 | Totally Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy After Middle Pancreatectomy: A Consecutive Nine-case Series at a Single Institution显示文摘 | Fernando Rotellar Fernando Pardo Custodia Montiel Alberto Benito Fernando M. Regueira Ignacio Poveda Pablo Martí-Cruchaga Javier A. Cienfuegos | 2008 | Annals of Surgery2008，，6： | 1 |
| 6 | Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy Extended to Middle Hepatic Vein After Right Portal Vein Embolization显示文摘 | Fernando Rotellar Fernando Pardo Alberto Benito Pablo Martí-Cruchaga Gabriel Zozaya Manuel Bellver | 2014 | Annals of Surgical Oncology2014，，1： | 1 |
| 7 | Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases显示文摘Background:The use of laparoscopic(LLR)and robotic liver resections(RLR)has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours.A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours≥10 cm.Methods:This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge(≥10 cm)tumors at 42 international centers between 2002-2020.Results:One hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were included.The comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching(PSM)(73 vs.219).Before PSM,LLR was associated with significantly increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery,malignant pathology,liver cirrhosis and increased median blood.After PSM,RLR and LLR was associated with no significant difference in key perioperative outcomes including media operation time(242 vs.290 min,P=0.286),transfusion rate rate(19.2%vs.16.9%,P=0.652),median blood loss(200 vs.300 mL,P=0.694),open conversion rate(8.2%vs.11.0%,P=0.519),morbidity(28.8%vs.21.9%,P=0.221),major morbidity(4.1%vs.9.6%,P=0.152),mortality and postoperative length of stay(6 vs.6 days,P=0.435).Conclusions:RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent outcomes.There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR. | Tan-To Cheung Rong Liu Federica Cipriani Xiaoying Wang Mikhail Efanov David Fuks Gi-Hong Choi Nicholas L.Syn Charing C.N.Chong Fabrizio Di Benedetto Ricardo Robles-Campos Vincenzo Mazzaferro Fernando Rotellar Santiago Lopez-Ben James O.Park Alejandro Mejia Iswanto Sucandy Adrian K.H.Chiow Marco V.Marino Mikel Gastaca Jae Hoon Lee TPeter Kingham Mathieu D’Hondt Sung Hoon Choi Robert P.Sutcliffe Ho-Seong Han Chung-Ngai Tang Johann Pratschke Roberto I.Troisi Go Wakabayashi Daniel Cherqui Felice Giuliante Davit L.Aghayan Bjorn Edwin Olivier Scatton Atsushi Sugioka Tran Cong Duy Long Constantino Fondevila Mohammad Abu Hilal Andrea Ruzzenente Alessandro Ferrero Paulo Herman Kuo-Hsin Chen Luca Aldrighetti Brian K.P.Goh International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，2： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员