维普中文期刊产品整合服务
12篇 您的检索式:作者名="Faek"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1A randomized open-label trial of on-demand rabeprazole vs ranitidine for patients with non-erosive reflux disease显示文摘AIM:To compare the efficacy of the proton-pump inhibitor,rabeprazole,with that of the H 2-receptor antagonist,ranitidine,as on-demand therapy for relieving symptoms associated with non-erosive reflux disease(NERD).METHODS:This is a single center,prospective,randomized,open-label trial of on-demand therapy with rabeprazole(group A) vs ranitidine(group B) for 4 wk.Eighty-three patients who presented to the American University of Beirut Medical Center with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) symptoms and a normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were eligible for the study.Patients in group A(n = 44) were allowed a maximum rabeprazole dose of 20 mg twice daily,while those in group B(n = 39) were allowed a maximum ranitidine dose of 300 mg twice daily.Efficacy was assessed by patient evaluation of global symptom relief,scores of the SF-36 quality of life(QoL) questionnaires,total number of pills used,and number of medication-free days.RESULTS:Among the 83 patients who were enrolled in the study,76 patients(40 in the rabeprazole group and 36 in the ranitidine group) completed the 4-wk trial.Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups.After 4 wk,there was no significant difference in the subjective global symptom relief between the rabeprazole and the ranitidine groups(71.4% vs 65.4%,respectively;P = 0.9).There were no statistically significant differences between mean cumulative scores of the SF-36 QoL questionnaire for the two study groups(rabeprazole 22.40 ± 27.53 vs ranitidine 17.28 ± 37.06;P = 0.582).There was no significant difference in the mean number of pills used(rabeprazole 35.70 ± 29.75 vs ranitidine 32.86 ± 26.98;P = 0.66).There was also no statistically significant difference in the mean number of medication-free days between both groups.CONCLUSION:Rabeprazole has a comparable efficacy compared to ranitidine when given on-demand for the treatment of NERD.Both medications were associated with improved quality of life.Abdallah A Kobeissy Jana G Hashash Faek R Jamali Assaad M Skoury Reham Haddad Sarah El-Samad Rami Ladki Rola Aswad Assaad M Soweid 2012World Journal of Gastroenterology2012,18,19:4
2Posterior lingual lidocaine: A novel method to improve tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy显示文摘AIM: To evaluate the effect of posterior lingual lidocaine swab on patient tolerance to esophagogastro-duodenoscopy, the ease of performance of the procedure, and to determine if such use will reduce the need for intravenous sedation. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy in a tertiary care medical center were randomized to either lidocaine swab or spray. Intravenous meperidine and midazolam were given as needed during the procedure. RESULTS: Patients in the lidocaine swab group (SWG) tolerated the procedure better than those in the spray group (SPG) with a median tolerability score of 2 (1, 4) compared to 4 (2, 5) (P < 0.01). The endoscopists encountered less diffi culty performing the proceduresin the SWG with lower median difficulty scores of 1 (1, 5) compared to 4 (1, 5) in the SPG (P < 0.01). In addition, the need for intravenous sedation was also lower in the SWG compared to the SPG with fewer patients requiring intravenous sedation (13/40 patients vs 38/40 patients, respectively, P < 0.01). The patients in the SWG were more satisfi ed with the mode of local anesthesia they received as compared to the SPG. In addition, the endoscopists were happier with the use of lidocaine swab. CONCLUSION: The use of a posterior lingual lidocaine swab in esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves patient comfort and tolerance and endoscopist satisfaction and decreases the need for intravenous sedation.Assaad M Soweid Shadi R Yaghi Faek R Jamali Abdallah A Kobeissy Michella E Mallat Rola Hussein Chakib M Ayoub 2011World Journal of Gastroenterology2011,17,47:2
3Prevalence of endoscopically identified heterotopic gastric mucosa in the proximal esophagus endoscopist depen-dent显示文摘Cecilio A Faek J Hala T 0,,05:1
4Safety of Laparoscopic Approach for Acute Cholecystitis: Retrospective Study of 609 Cases显示文摘Beno?t Navez Didier Mutter Yves Russier Michel Vix Faek Jamali David Lipski Emmanuel Cambier Pierre Guiot Jo?l Leroy Jacques Marescaux 2001World Journal of Surgery2001,,10:1
5Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total excised axillary lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer 显示文摘Hassan A Faek R Nagi S 2009Ann Snrg Oncol2009,16,12:1
6On the Linkages between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates: Evidence from the Banking Crisis of 2007-2010 显示文摘Guglielmo Maria Caporale John Hunter Faek Menla Ali 2014International Review of Financial Analysis2014,,33:1
7Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study显示文摘Khaled M Musallam Hani M Tamim Toby Richards Donat R Spahn Frits R Rosendaal Aida Habbal Mohammad Khreiss Fadi S Dahdaleh Kaivan Khavandi Pierre M Sfeir Assaad Soweid Jamal J Hoballah Ali T Taher Faek R Jamali 2011The Lancet2011,,9800:1
8Safety of Laparoscopic Approach for Acute Cholecystitis: Retrospective Study of 609 Cases显示文摘Beno?t Navez Didier Mutter Yves Russier Michel Vix Faek Jamali David Lipski Emmanuel Cambier Pierre Guiot Jo?l Leroy Jacques Marescaux 2001World Journal of Surgery2001,,10:1
9Prevalence of Endoscopically Identified Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa in the Proximal Esophagus: Endoscopist Dependent?显示文摘Cecilio Azar Faek Jamali Hala Tamim Heitham Abdul-Baki Assaad Soweid 2007Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology2007,,5:1
10Safety of Laparoscopic Approach for Acute Cholecystitis: Retrospective Study of 609 Cases显示文摘Beno?t Navez Didier Mutter Yves Russier Michel Vix Faek Jamali David Lipski Emmanuel Cambier Pierre Guiot Jo?l Leroy Jacques Marescaux 2001World Journal of Surgery2001,,10:1
11An uncommon lacation of Meckel's diverticulum or small intestine duplication? Case report and literature review显示文摘Walczak DA Faek W ZakrLewski J 2011Pol Przegl Chir2011,83,8:1
12An uncommon lacation ofMeekel's diverticulum or small intestine duplication? Case report and literature review显示文摘Walczak DA Faek W Zakrzewski J 2011Pol Przegl Chir2011,83,8:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费