维普中文期刊产品整合服务
594篇 您的检索式:作者名="Bechtold"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound:A meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected. Articles were searched in Medline and Pubmed. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of EUS was analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. Pooling was conducted by both the Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model). The heterogeneity of studies was tested using Cochran’s Q test based upon inverse variance weights. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies (n = 2558) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T1 was 81.6% (95% CI: 77.8-84.9) and 99.4% (95% CI: 99.0-99.7), respectively. To diagnose T4, EUS had a pooled sensitivity of 92.4% (95% CI: 89.2-95.0) and specificity of 97.4% (95% CI: 96.6-98.0). With Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), sensitivity of EUS to diagnose N stage improved from 84.7% (95% CI: 82.9-86.4) to 96.7% (95% CI: 92.4-98.9). The P value for the χ2 test of heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was > 0.10. CONCLUSION: EUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity in accurately diagnosing the TN stage of esophageal cancer. EUS performs better with advanced (T4) than early (T1) disease. FNA substantially improves the sensitivity and specificity of EUS in evaluating N stage disease. EUS should be strongly considered for staging esophageal cancer.Srinivas R Puli Jyotsna BK Reddy Matthew L Bechtold Daphne Antillon Jamal A Ibdah Mainor R Antillon 2008World Journal of Gastroenterology2008,14,10:55
2How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for staging of gastric cancers. METHODS: Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected. Only studies from which a 2 × 2 table could be constructed for true positive, false negative, false positive and true negative values were included. Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, Ovid journals, Cumulative index for nursing & allied health literature, International pharmaceutical abstracts, old Medline, Medline nonindexed citations, and Cochrane control trial registry. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. The differences were resolved by mutual agreement. 2 × 2 tables were constructed with the data extracted from each study. Meta-analysis for the accuracy of EUS was analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specifi city, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. Pooling was conducted by both the Mantel-Haenszel method (fi xed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model). The heterogeneity of studies was tested using Cochran's Q test based upon inverse variance weights. RESULTS: Initial search identified 1620 reference articles and of these, 376 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Twenty-two studies (n = 1896) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity of T1 was 88.1% (95% CI: 84.5-91.1) and T2 was 82.3% (95% CI: 78.2-86.0). For T3, pooled sensitivity was 89.7% (95% CI: 87.1-92.0). T4 hada pooled sensitivity of 99.2% (95% CI: 97.1-99.9). For nodal staging, the pooled sensitivity for N1 was 58.2% (95% CI: 53.5-62.8) and N2 was 64.9% (95% CI: 60.8-68.8). Pooled sensitivity to diagnose distant metastasis was 73.2% (95% CI: 63.2-81.7). The P for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10. CONCLUSION: EUS results are more accurate with advanced disease than early disease. If EUS diagnoses advanced disease, such as T4 disease, the patient is 500 times more likely to have true anatomic stage of T4 disease.Srinivas Reddy Puli Jyotsna Batapati Krishna Reddy Matthew L Bechtold Mainor R Antillon Jamal A Ibdah 2008World Journal of Gastroenterology2008,14,25:33
3Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta analysis显示文摘AIM: To detect pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has been varied. This study is undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in detecting PNETs.METHODS: Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery or appropriate follow-up were selected. Articles were searched in Medline, Ovid journals, Medline nonindexed citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews. Pooling was conducted by both fixed and random effects model). RESULTS: Initial search identified 2610 reference articles, of these 140 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data was extracted from 13 studies (n = 456) which met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in detecting a PNETs was 87.2% (95%CI: 82.2-91.2). EUS had a pooled specificity of 98.0% (95%CI: 94.3-99.6). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 11.1 (95%CI: 5.34-22.8) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.17 (95%CI: 0.13-0.24). The diagnostic odds ratio, the odds of having anatomic PNETs in positive as compared to negative EUS studies was 94.7 (95%CI: 37.9-236.1). Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator for publication bias gave a Kendall's tau value of 0.31 (P = 0.16), indication no publication bias. The P for χ2 heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10. CONCLUSION: EUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity to detect PNETs. EUS should be strongly considered for evaluation of PNETs.Srinivas R Puli Nikhil Kalva Matthew L Bechtold Smitha R Pamulaparthy Micheal D Cashman Norman C Estes Richard H Pearl Fritz-Henry Volmar Sonu Dillon Michael F Shekleton David Forcione 2013World Journal of Gastroenterology2013,19,23:14
4Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis:A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of early precut technique.Multiple randomized controlled trails(RCTs)have reported conflicting results of the early precut sphincterotomy.METHODS:MEDLINE/PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews,and recent abstracts from major conference proceedings were searched(June 2013).Randomized and non-randomized studies comparing early precut technique with prolonged standard methods were included.Pooled estimates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP),cannulation and adverse events were analyzed by using odds ratio(OR).Random and fixed effects models were used as appropriate.Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots.Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by calculating I2 measure of inconsistency.RESULTS:Seven randomized and seven non-randomized trials met inclusion criteria.Meta-analysis of RCTs showed a decrease trend for PEP with early precut sphincterotomy but was not statistically significant(OR=0.58;95%CI:0.32-1.05;P=0.07).No heterogeneity was noted among the studies with I2 of 0%.CONCLUSION:Early precut technique for common bile duct cannulation decreases the trend of post-ERCP pancreatitis.Abhishek Choudhary Jessica Winn Sameer Siddique Murtaza Arif Zainab Arif Ghassan M Hammoud Srinivas R Puli Jamal A Ibdah Matthew L Bechtold 2014World Journal of Gastroenterology2014,20,14:13
5Endoscopic ultrasound:It’s accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy. METHODS:Only EUS and EUS-FNA studies confirmed by surgery or with appropriate follow-up were selected. Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, and Cochrane control trial registry. Only studies from which a 2 × 2 table could be constructed for true positive, false negative, false positive and true negative values were included. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. The differences were resolved by mutual agreement. Meta-analysis for the accuracy of EUS was analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. Pooling was conducted by both Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model). The heterogeneity of studies was tested using Cochran’s Q test based upon inverse variance weights. RESULTS:Data was extracted from 76 studies (n = 9310) which met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 44 studies used EUS alone and 32 studies used EUS-FNA. FNA improved the sensitivity of EUS from 84.7% (95% CI:82.9-86.4) to 88.0% (95% CI:85.8-90.0). With FNA, the specificity of EUS improved from 84.6% (95% CI:83.2-85.9) to 96.4% (95% CI:95.3-97.4). The P forchi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10. CONCLUSION:EUS is highly sensitive and specific for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and FNA substantially improves this. EUS with FNA should be the diagnostic test of choice for evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy.Srinivas R Puli Jyotsna Batapati Krishna Reddy Matthew L Bechtold Jamal A Ibdah Daphne Antillon Shailender Singh Mojtaba Olyaee Mainor R Antillon 2008World Journal of Gastroenterology2008,14,19:10
6Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy:A continual search for excellence显示文摘Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy is essential to maximize the benefits of colonoscopy.Numerous bowel preparations have been studied,ranging from 4 L polyethylene glycol(PEG) to split-dose regimens to 2 L PEG with an adjunct laxative(senna,bisacodyl,ascorbic acid).Due to the large volume of PEG required for adequate bowel preparation,many studies have focused on reducing this large volume to only 2 L PEG with the addition of an adjunct.Recently,a randomized controlled trial by Tajika et al showed that the addition of mosapride to only 1.5 L PEG was non-inferior to mosapride and 2 L PEG for bowel cleansing but did provide improvements in patient tolerance.This study offers yet another potential bowel preparation for patients undergoing colonoscopy and may trigger further studies with 1.5 L PEG with an adjunct.In this letter,we discuss the current state of bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy and offer information to guide clinicians on choosing the appropriate bowel preparation for their patients.Matthew L Bechtold Abhishek Choudhary 2013World Journal of Gastroenterology2013,19,2:9
7Effect of music on patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy显示文摘AIM: To evaluate the effect of relaxing music during colonoscopy under low-dose conscious sedation, on patient satisfaction, scope insertion time and procedure duration, medication doses, and the perceived adequacy of sedation and scope insertion difficulty on the part of the endoscopist. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven consecutive adult outpatients presenting for routine colonoscopy under low-dose conscious sedation were randomized to undergo their procedures either with music played during the procedure or no music played. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of meperidine dose, midazolam dose, time to reach the cecum, total procedure time, endoscopist assessment of scope insertion difficulty, endoscopist assessment of adequacy of sedation, or the pain experience of the patients during their procedure. The music group did report significantly better overall procedure satisfaction as compared to the non music group on two of our three different scales. CONCLUSION: While music does not result in shortened procedure times, lower doses of sedative medications or perceived patient pain, the patients who have music playing during their procedures report modestly greater satisfaction with their procedures.Matthew L Bechtold Rodney A Perez Srinivas R Puli John B Marshall 2006World Journal of Gastroenterology2006,12,45:8
8Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials显示文摘Todd W. Kilgore Abdillahi A. Abdinoor Nicholas M. Szary Samuel W. Schowengerdt Jamie B. Yust Abhishek Choudhary Michelle L. Matteson Srinivas R. Puli John B. Marshall Matthew L. Bechtold 2011Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2011,,6:6
9Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: How do day 1 and day 2 results compare?显示文摘AIM: To investigate if differences exist for patients’ gastroesophageal reflux as measured by the Bravo ambulatory esophageal pH system between d 1 and d 2. METHODS: A retrospective study of 27 consecutive adult patients who underwent Bravo esophageal pH monitoring was performed. Patients underwent EGD under Ⅳ conscious sedation prior to Bravo placement. Acid reflux variables and symptom scores for d 1 were compared to d 2. RESULTS: The mean doses of fentanyl and midazolam were 90.4 μg and 7.2 mg, respectively. D 1 results were significantly more elevated than d 2 with respect to total time pH < 4, upright position reflux, and mean number of long refluxes. No statistical difference was noted between the two days for supine position reflux, number of refluxes, duration of longest reflux, episodes of heartburn, and symptom score. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing Bravo esophageal pH monitoring in association with EGD and moderate conscious sedation experience significantly more acid reflux on d 1 compared to d 2. The Ⅳ sedation may be responsible for the increased reflux on d 1. Performed this way, 48-h Bravo results may not be entirely representative of the patients’ true GE reflux profile.Matthew L Bechtold Jason-Scott L Holly Klaus Thaler John B Marshall 2007World Journal of Gastroenterology2007,13,30:4
10EUS-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis for Pain due to Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatic Cancer Pain: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review显示文摘Srinivas R. Puli Jyotsna B. K. Reddy Matthew L. Bechtold Mainor R. Antillon William R. Brugge 2009Digestive Diseases and Sciences2009,,11:4
11Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection: A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM To perform meta-analysis of the use of Endocuff during average risk screening colonoscopy.METHODS Scopus, Cochrane databases, MEDLINE/Pub Med, and CINAHL were searched in April 2016. Abstracts from Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology, and the American College of Gastroenterology meeting were also searched from 2004-2015. Studies comparing EC-assisted colonoscopy(EAC) to standard colonoscopy, for any indication, were included in the analysis. The analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerS imonian and Laird models with the odds ratio(OR) to assess adenoma detection, cecal intubation rate, and complications performed. RESULTS Nine studies(n = 5624 patients) were included in the analysis. Compared to standard colonoscopy, procedures performed with EC had higher frequencies for adenoma(OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.23-1.80; P = 0.03), and sessile serrated adenomas detection(OR = 2.34 95%CI: 1.63-3.36; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cecal intubation rates between the EACgroup and standard colonoscopy(OR = 1.26, 95%CI: 0.70-2.27, I2 = 0%; P = 0.44). EAC was associated with a higher risk of complications, most commonly being superficial mucosal injury without higher frequency for perforation.CONCLUSION The use of an EC on colonoscopy appears to improve pre-cancerous polyp detection without any difference in cecal intubation rates compared to standard colonoscopy.Matthew Chin William Karnes M Mazen Jamal John G Lee Robert Lee Jason Samarasena Matthew L Bechtold Douglas L Nguyen 2016World Journal of Gastroenterology2016,22,43:4
12T213L31全球模式的云和对流参数化方案改进试验显示文摘针对中国业务中期数值预报模式T213对中雨量级以上的降水预报空报比较明显的问题,文中对此模式预报的降水进行了诊断分析。发现T213模式预报的总降水分布主要是由可分辨尺度降水决定的,且在降水偏多最明显的地区,可分辨尺度的降水即超过或达到了观测的总降水,表明降水空报的主要原因在于可分辨尺度降水偏多。可分辨尺度降水偏多的可能原因有:土壤湿度初始化、云变量的初始化和直接产生降水的云与对流参数化方案存在一定的缺陷。鉴于前两者是目前国际上的难点,文中针对第3个方面的可能原因进行了分析和相应的改进。包括在对流方案之前增加一次云方案的调用;对流参数化方案的闭合由'动力型'改为对流有效位能调整闭合;更复杂的对流触发机制;改进冰沉降和降水通量计算。改进的主要目的是使对流参数化方案更活跃,从而减少格点尺度对流的发生。采用改进的方案,进行了敏感性试验和2005年夏季的连续滚动同化预报试验,并与中国区域400个标准站的降水观测和GPCP的全球降水观测进行了比较。结果表明,改进的方案无论是对中国区域还是全球夏季平均的降水分布预报都好于业务,但四川省和赤道东太平洋降水偏多的问题依然存在。中国区域的降水统计检验还表明,除小雨外,其他量级在大部分时效上降水的TS评分增加,预报偏差降低。陈起英 李泽椿 管成功 佟华 王雨 Peter Bechtold 2009气象学报2009,67,2:3
13Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘Abhishek Choudhary Matthew L. Bechtold Murtaza Arif Nicholas M. Szary Srinivas R. Puli Mohamed O. Othman Wilson P. Pais Mainor R. Antillon Praveen K. Roy 2011Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2011,,2:3
14Technica feadibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality 显示文摘Vining DJ Gelfand Bechtold RE 1994AJR1994,,:2
15Bleeding risk with clopidogrel and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy显示文摘AIM To compare bleeding within 48 h in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) with or without clopidogrel.METHODS After institutional review board approval, a retrospective study involving a single center was conducted on adult patients having PEG(1/08-1/14). Patients were divided into two groups: Clopidogrel group consisting of those patients taking clopidogrel within 5 d of PEG and the non-clopidogrel group including those patients not taking clopidogrel within 5 d of the PEG.RESULTS Three hundred and nineteen PEG patients were found. One hundred and sixty-eight males and 151 females with mean body mass index 28.47 ± 9.75 kg/m2 and mean age 65.03 ± 16.11 years were identified. Thirtythree patients were on clopidogrel prior to PEG with 286 patients not on clopidogrel. No patients in either group developed hematochezia, melena, or hematemesiswithin 48 h of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG). No statistical differences were observed between the two groups with 48 h for hemoglobin decrease of > 2 g/dL(2 vs 5 patients; P = 0.16), blood transfusions(2 vs 7 patients; P = 0.24), and repeat endoscopy for possible gastrointestinal bleeding(no patients in either group). CONCLUSION Based on the results, no significant post-procedure bleeding was observed in patients undergoing PEG with recent use of clopidogrel.Umair Sohail Chela Harleen Amin O Mahdi Murtaza Arif Douglas L Nguyen Matthew L Bechtold 2016World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2016,8,16:2
16Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fiducial marker placement in pancreatic cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer(PC)mortality remains high despite advances in therapy.Combination chemoradiotherapy offers modest survival benefit over monotherapy with either.Fiducial markers serve as needed landmarks for imageguided radiotherapy(IGRT).Traditionally,these markers were placed surgically or percutaneously with limitations of each.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement overcomes these limitations.AIM To evaluate the safety,efficacy,and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided fiducial placement for PC undergoing IGRT.METHODS Articles were searched in MEDLINE,PubMed,and Ovid journals.Pooling was conducted by fixed and random effects models.Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test based upon inverse variance weights.RESULTS Initial search identified 1024 reference articles for EUS-guided fiducial placement in PC.Of these,261 relevant articles were reviewed.Data was extracted from 11 studies(n=820)meeting inclusion criteria.Pooled proportion of successful placement was 96.27%(95%CI:95.35-97.81)with fiducial migration rates low at 4.33%(95%CI:2.45-6.71).Adverse event rates remained low,with overall pooled proportion of 4.85%(95%CI:3.04-7.03).CONCLUSION EUS-guided placement of fiducial markers for IGRT of PC is safe,feasible,and efficacious.The ability to target deep structures under direct visualization while remaining minimally invasive are added benefits.Moreover,the ability to perform fine needle aspiration or celiac plexus neurolysis add value and increase patient-care efficiency.Whether EUS-guided fiducial placement improves outcomes in IGRT or offers any mortality benefits over traditional placement remains unknown and future studies are needed.Jaymon B Patel Vakya Revanur David G Forcione Matthew L Bechtold Srinivas R Puli 2020World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2020,12,8:2
17Technical feasibiltiy of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality(abstr)显示文摘Vining DJ Gelfand DW Bechtold RE 1994AJR1994,,:1
18Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality显示文摘Vining DJ Gelfand DW Bechtold DE 2003AJR2003,,:1
19Blood hemoglobin level may affect radiosensitivity-preliminary results on acutely reacting normal tissues显示文摘Henke M Bechtold C Momm F 2000Int J Radiat Oncol Bid Phys2000,48,2:1
20Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta?analysis and systematic review显示文摘Puli SR Reddy JB Bechtold ML 2009Ann Surg Oncol2009,16,5:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共30页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /30 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费