|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Ganglioneuroma of the adrenal gland and retroperitoneum: a case report 显示文摘 | Sucandy I Akrnal YM Sheldon DG | 2011 | North American Journal of Medical Sciences2011，3，7： | 1 |
| 2 | Minimally invasive liver resection for huge(≥10cm)tumors:an international multicenter matched cohort study with regression discontinuity analyses显示文摘Background:The application and feasibility of minimally invasive liver resection(MILR)for huge liver tumours(≥10 cm)has not been well documented.Methods:Retrospective analysis of data on 6,617 patients who had MILR for liver tumours were gathered from 21 international centers between 2009-2019.Huge tumors and large tumors were defined as tumors with a size≥10.0 cm and 3.0-9.9 cm based on histology,respectively.1:1 coarsened exact-matching(CEM)and 1:2 Mahalanobis distance-matching(MDM)was performed according to clinically-selected variables.Regression discontinuity analyses were performed as an additional line of sensitivity analysis to estimate local treatment effects at the 10-cm tumor size cutoff.Results:Of 2,890 patients with tumours≥3 cm,there were 205 huge tumors.After 1:1 CEM,174 huge tumors were matched to 174 large tumors;and after 1:2 MDM,190 huge tumours were matched to 380 large tumours.There was significantly and consistently increased intraoperative blood loss,frequency in the application of Pringle maneuver,major morbidity and postoperative stay in the huge tumour group compared to the large tumour group after both 1:1 CEM and 1:2 MDM.These findings were reinforced in RD analyses.Intraoperative blood transfusion rate and open conversion rate were significantly higher in the huge tumor group after only 1:2 MDM but not 1:1 CEM.Conclusions:MILR for huge tumours can be safely performed in expert centers It is an operation with substantial complexity and high technical requirement,with worse perioperative outcomes compared to MILR for large tumors,therefore judicious patient selection is pivotal. | Tan-To Cheung Xiaoying Wang Mikhail Efanov Rong Liu David Fuks Gi-Hong Choi Nicholas LSyn Charing CChong Iswanto Sucandy Adrian KHChiow Marco VMarino Mikel Gastaca Jae Hoon Lee TPeter Kingham Mathieu D’Hondt Sung Hoon Choi Robert PSutcliffe Ho-Seong Han Chung Ngai Tang Johann Pratschke Roberto ITroisi Brian KPGoh International Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group Collaborators | 2021 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2021，10，5： | 1 |
| 3 | Current state of single-port laparoseopie eholeeysteetomy in children显示文摘 | Chrestiana D Sucandy I | 2013 | Am Surg2013，79，9： | 1 |
| 4 | Outcome analysis of early laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy experience显示文摘 | Sucandy I Antanavicius G Bonanni | 2013 | JSLS2013，17，4： | 1 |
| 5 | Current state of single-port laparoscopic cholecysteetomy in children显示文摘 | Chrestiana D Sucandy I | 2013 | Am Surg2013，79，9： | 1 |
| 6 | surgical management of cystic adventitial disease of the popliteal artery显示文摘 | Sucandy I Goldhahn R Jr Abai B | 2012 | Am surg2012，78，6： | 1 |
| 7 | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia in children:Report of 100 cases from a single institution 显示文摘 | Constantinou C Sucandy I Ramenofsky M | 2008 | Am Surg2008，74，： | 1 |
| 8 | Evidence supporting laparoscopic major hepatectomy 显示文摘 | Cheek SM Sucandy I Tsung A | 2016 | J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci2016，23，5： | 1 |
| 9 | Ganglioneuroma of the adren- al gland and retroperitoneum: a case report显示文摘 | Sucandy I Akmal YM Sheldon DG | 2011 | N Am Med Sci2011，3，7： | 1 |
| 10 | Ganglioneuroma of the adrenal gland and retroperitoneum:A case report显示文摘 | Sucandy I Akmal YM Sheldon DG | | 0，，： | 1 |
| 11 | The future of minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC stage 0-A显示文摘Minimally invasive liver resection is moving toward the gold standard treatment for liver cancer due to its short-term clinical advantages when compared to the traditional open operation.The advent of robotic surgical system which enables surgeons to undertake liver resections that were technically difficult/impossible laparoscopically further advances forward the minimally invasive field. | Trenton Lippert Allyson Lim-Dy Iswanto Sucandy | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，4： | 0 |
| 12 | The use of thermal ablation in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis-proper selection and application of technology显示文摘Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and it is ranked the second most frequent cause of cancer associated mortality in the western countries(1).Around 50%of colorectal cancer patients eventually develop liver metastases and when left untreated,colorectal liver metastasis(CLM)leads to only 31%survival rate at 1 year,7.9%at 2 years,2.6%at 3 years and 0.9%at 4 years(2).While complete surgical resection via hepatectomy is the accepted gold standard,thermal ablation has been used as an alternative or adjunctive treatment in patients with CLM.The use of thermal ablation for treatment of CLM can vary based on the local practice and individual referral pattern,however it is important to understand the proper utilization of this technology as well as its important clinical aspects. | Furrukh Jabbar Cameron Syblis Iswanto Sucandy | 2021 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2021，10，2： | 0 |
| 13 | Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases显示文摘Background:The use of laparoscopic(LLR)and robotic liver resections(RLR)has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours.A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours≥10 cm.Methods:This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge(≥10 cm)tumors at 42 international centers between 2002-2020.Results:One hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were included.The comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching(PSM)(73 vs.219).Before PSM,LLR was associated with significantly increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery,malignant pathology,liver cirrhosis and increased median blood.After PSM,RLR and LLR was associated with no significant difference in key perioperative outcomes including media operation time(242 vs.290 min,P=0.286),transfusion rate rate(19.2%vs.16.9%,P=0.652),median blood loss(200 vs.300 mL,P=0.694),open conversion rate(8.2%vs.11.0%,P=0.519),morbidity(28.8%vs.21.9%,P=0.221),major morbidity(4.1%vs.9.6%,P=0.152),mortality and postoperative length of stay(6 vs.6 days,P=0.435).Conclusions:RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent outcomes.There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR. | Tan-To Cheung Rong Liu Federica Cipriani Xiaoying Wang Mikhail Efanov David Fuks Gi-Hong Choi Nicholas L.Syn Charing C.N.Chong Fabrizio Di Benedetto Ricardo Robles-Campos Vincenzo Mazzaferro Fernando Rotellar Santiago Lopez-Ben James O.Park Alejandro Mejia Iswanto Sucandy Adrian K.H.Chiow Marco V.Marino Mikel Gastaca Jae Hoon Lee TPeter Kingham Mathieu D’Hondt Sung Hoon Choi Robert P.Sutcliffe Ho-Seong Han Chung-Ngai Tang Johann Pratschke Roberto I.Troisi Go Wakabayashi Daniel Cherqui Felice Giuliante Davit L.Aghayan Bjorn Edwin Olivier Scatton Atsushi Sugioka Tran Cong Duy Long Constantino Fondevila Mohammad Abu Hilal Andrea Ruzzenente Alessandro Ferrero Paulo Herman Kuo-Hsin Chen Luca Aldrighetti Brian K.P.Goh International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，2： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员