| 8 | Mental health impact of the Middle East respiratory syndrome,SARS,and COVID-19:A comparative systematic review and metaanalysis显示文摘BACKGROUND Over the last few decades,3 pathogenic pandemics have impacted the global population;severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus(SARS-CoV),Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus(MERS-CoV)and SARS-CoV-2.The global disease burden has attributed to millions of deaths and morbidities,with the majority being attributed to SARS-CoV-2.As such,the evaluation of the mental health(MH)impact across healthcare professionals(HCPs),patients and the general public would be an important facet to evaluate to better understand short,medium and long-term exposures.AIM To identify and report:(1)MH conditions commonly observed across all 3 pandemics;(2)Impact of MH outcomes across HCPs,patients and the general public associated with all 3 pandemics;and(3)The prevalence of the MH impact and clinical epidemiological significance.METHODS A systematic methodology was developed and published on PROSPERO(CRD42021228697).The databases PubMed,EMBASE,ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used as part of the data extraction process,and publications from January 1,1990 to August 1,2021 were searched.MeSH terms and keywords used included Mood disorders,PTSD,Anxiety,Depression,Psychological stress,Psychosis,Bipolar,Mental Health,Unipolar,Self-harm,BAME,Psychiatry disorders and Psychological distress.The terms were expanded with a‘snowballing’method.Cox-regression and the Monte-Carlo simulation method was used in addition to I2 and Egger’s tests to determine heterogeneity and publication bias.RESULTS In comparison to MERS and SARS-CoV,it is evident SAR-CoV-2 has an ongoing MH impact,with emphasis on depression,anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.CONCLUSION It was evident MH studies during MERS and SARS-CoV was limited in comparison to SARS-CoV-2,with much emphasis on reporting symptoms of depression,anxiety,stress and sleep disturbances.The lack of comprehensive studies conducted during previous pandemics have introduced limitations to the“know-how”for clinicians and researchers to better support patients and deliver care with limited healthcare resources. | Gayathri Delanerolle Yutian Zeng Jian-Qing Shi Xuzhi Yeng Will Goodison Ashish Shetty Suchith Shetty Nyla Haque Kathryn Elliot Sandali Ranaweera Rema Ramakrishnan Vanessa Raymont Shanaya Rathod Peter Phiri | 2022 | World Journal of Psychiatry2022，12，5： | 0 |
| 9 | Rapid commentary:Ethical implications for clinical trialists and patients associated with COVID-19 research显示文摘Pandemics disrupt clinical trials worldwide,with lasting effects on research.It can severely impact clinical trialists ability to conduct safe and ethically uncompromised trials.Hence,the mounting pressure results in ethically and morally distressing decisions faced by clinical trial professionals during pandemic situations.Whilst clinical trialists attempt to think about preparedness and responses during a pandemic,the need to have an ethical framework that has real-world applicability is imperative.Pandemics are a challenging time for all,however,the safety and access to support for clinical trialists and patients within clinical trials should be at the forefront for their organisations and the government. | Gayathri Delanerolle Shanaya Rathod Kathryn Elliot Rema Ramakrishnan Tony Thayanandan Natasha Sandle Nyla Haque Vanessa Raymont Peter Phiri | 2021 | World Journal of Psychiatry2021，11，3： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员