维普中文期刊产品整合服务
9篇 您的检索式:作者名="Joseph Plummer"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country显示文摘AIM: To compare the short-term, including oncologic, outcomes of open vs laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in a developing country. METHODS: The records of patients who underwent elective open and laparoscopic colectomies for cancer at the University Hospital of the West Indies between January 2005 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic(age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index score), peri-operative, post-operative and oncologic data were collected for each patient. Specific oncologic variables included lymph node yield, pathologic stage, grade, proximal, distal and circumferential margin involvement. Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and binary logistic regression tests were used for analysis. Significance level was set atP < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 87 cases for open colectomy(OC) and 17 cases for laparoscopic colectomy(LC). Demographics did not significantly differ between OC and LC groups. Intra-operative blood loss and postoperative analgesic requirements did not significantly differ between groups. There was a trend towards longer operating times in OC group and shorter hospital stay in the LC group. Lymph node yield(14 vs 14, P = 0.619), proximal(10 cm vs 7 cm, P = 0.353) and distal(8 cm vs 8 cm, P = 0.57) resection margin distance and circumferential margin involvement(9 vs 0, P = 0.348) did not significantly differ between groups. Thirty-day morbidity was equivalent between groups(22 vs 6, P = 0.774). There were 6 deaths within 30 d of initial procedure, all in the OC group(6.9%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colectomy in a developing country is oncologically safe and represents a option for colonic malignancies in these regions. Such data encourage the continued laparoscopic development.Pierre-Anthony Leake Kristen Pitzul Patrick O Roberts Joseph M Plummer 2013World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2013,5,11:8
2Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer: No surgery, minimal surgery or minimally invasive surgery显示文摘Over the last decade,with the acceptance of the need for improvements in the outcome of patients affected with rectal cancer,there has been a significant increase in the literature regarding treatment options available to patients affected by this disease.That treatment related decisions should be made at a high volume multidisciplinary tumor board,after pre-operative rectal magnetic resonance imaging and the importance of total mesorectal excision(TME)are accepted standard of care.More controversial is the emerging role for watchful waiting rather than radical surgery in complete pathologic responders,which may be appropriate in 20%of patients.Patients with early T1 rectal cancers and favorable pathologic features can be cured with local excision only,with transanal minimal invasive surgery(TAMIS)because of its versatility and almost universal availability of the necessary equipment and skillset in the average laparoscopic surgeon,emerging as the leading option.Recent trials have raised concerns about the oncologic outcomes of the standard'top-down'TME hence transanal TME(Ta TME'bottom-up')approach has gained popularity as an alternative.The challenges are many,with a dearth of evidence of the oncologic superiority in the long-term for any given option.However,this review highlights recent advances in the role of chemoradiation only for complete pathologic responders,TAMIS for highly selected early rectal cancer patients and Ta TME as options to improve cure rates whilst maintaining quality of life in these patients,while we await the results of further definitive trials being currently conducted.Joseph M Plummer Pierre-Anthony Leake Matthew R Albert 2017World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2017,9,6:6
3The concept and Application of Life Style segmentation 显示文摘Plummer Joseph T 1974Journal of Marketing1974,,1:1
4How Personality Makes a Difference 显示文摘Joseph T Plummer 2000Journal of Advertising Research2000,,6:1
5How personality makes a difference? 显示文摘Plummer Joseph T 1985Journal of Advertising Research1985,24,6:1
6Implementing energy efficiency: Challenges and opportunities for rural electric co-operatives and small municipal utilities显示文摘Elizabeth J. Wilson Joseph Plummer Miriam Fischlein Timothy M. Smith 2008Energy Policy2008,,9:1
7HOW Personality Makes a Difference显示文摘JOSEPH T PLUMMER 2000Journal of Advertising Research2000,40,6:1
8Pathological factors affecting gastric adenocarcinoma survival in a Caribbean population from 2000-2010显示文摘AIM: To investigate pathological factors related to long term patient survival post surgical management of gas-tric adenocarcinoma in a Caribbean population.METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of all patients treated surgically for gastric adenocarci-noma from January 1st 2000 to December 31 st 2010 at The University Hospital of the West Indies, an urban Jamaican hospital. Pathological reports of all gastrecto-my specimens post gastric cancer resection during the specified interval were accessed. Patients with a final diagnosis other than adenocarcinoma, as well as pa-tients having undergone surgery at an external institu-tion were excluded. The clinical records of the selected cohort were reviewed. The following variables were analysed; patient gender, patient age, the number of gastrectomies previous performed by the lead surgeon, the gross anatomical location and appearance of the tumour, the histological appearance of the tumour, infil-tration of the tumour into stomach wall and surround-ing structures, presence of Helicobacter pylori and the presence of gastritis. Patient status as dead vs alive was documented for the end of the interval. The effect of the aforementioned factors on patient survival were analysed using Logrank tests, Cox regression models, Ranksum tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests and Kaplan-Meier curves.RESULTS: A total of 79 patients, 36 males and 43 fe-males, were included. Their median age was 67 years(range 36-86 years). Median survival time from surgery was 70 mo with 40.5% of patients dying before the termination date of the study. Tumours ranged from 0.8 cm in size to encompassing the entire stomach speci-men, with a median tumour size of 6 cm. The median number of nodes removed at surgery was 8 with a maximum of 28. The median number of positive lymph nodes found was 2, with a range of 0 to 22. Patients' median survival time was approximately 70 mo, with 40.5% of the patients in this cohort dying before the terminal date. An increase in the incidence of cardiac tumours was noted compared to the previous 10 year interval(7.9% to 9.1%). Patients who had serosal involvement of the tumour did have a significantly shorter survival than those who did not(P = 0.017). A significant increase in the hazard ratio(HR), 2.424, for patients with circumferential tumours was found(P = 0.044). Via Kaplan-Meier estimates, the presence of venous infiltration as well as involvement of the circum-ferential resection margin were found to be poor prog-nostic markers, decreasing survival at 50 mo by 46.2% and 36.3% respectively. The increased HR for venous infiltration, 2.424, trended toward significant(P = 0.055) Age, size of tumour, number of positive nodes found and total number of lymph nodes removed were not useful predictors of survival. It is noted that the results were mostly negative, that is many tumour character-istics did not indicate any evidence of affecting patient survival. The current sample, with 30 observed events(deaths), would have about 30% power to detect a HR of 2.5.CONCLUSION: This study mirrors pathological factors used for gastric cancer prognostication in other popu-lations. As evaluation continues, a larger cohort will strengthen the significance of observed trends.Patrick O Roberts Joseph Plummer Pierre-Anthony Leake Shane Scott Tamara G de Souza Ayesha Johnson Tracey N Gibson Barrie Hanchard Marvin Reid 2014World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2014,6,6:0
9Colorectal resections for malignancy: A pilot study comparing conventional vs freehand robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy显示文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopic colectomy is widely accepted as a safe operation for colorectal cancer,but we have experienced resistance to the introduction of the FreeHandffrobotic camera holder to augment laparoscopic colorectal surgery.AIM To compare the initial results between conventional and FreeHandffrobot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy in Trinidad and Tobago.METHODS This was a prospective study of outcomes from all laparoscopic colectomies per-formed for colorectal carcinoma from November 29,2021 to May 30,2022.The following data were recorded:Operating time,conversions,estimated blood loss,hospitalization,morbidity,surgical resection margins and number of nodes har-vested.All data were entered into an excel database and the data were analyzed using SPSS ver 20.0.RESULTS There were 23 patients undergoing colectomies for malignant disease:8(35%)FreeHandff-assisted and 15(65%)conventional laparoscopic colectomies.There were no conversions.Operating time was significantly lower in patients under-going robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy(95.13±9.22 vs 105.67±11.48 min;P=0.045).Otherwise,there was no difference in estimated blood loss,nodal harvest,hospitalization,morbidity or mortality.CONCLUSION The FreeHandffrobot for colectomies is safe,provides some advantages over conventional laparoscopy and does not compromise oncologic standards in the resource-poor Caribbean setting.Shamir O Cawich Joseph Martin Plummer Sahle Griffith Vijay Naraynsingh 2024World Journal of Clinical Cases2024,12,3:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费