|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis:A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of early precut technique.Multiple randomized controlled trails(RCTs)have reported conflicting results of the early precut sphincterotomy.METHODS:MEDLINE/PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews,and recent abstracts from major conference proceedings were searched(June 2013).Randomized and non-randomized studies comparing early precut technique with prolonged standard methods were included.Pooled estimates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP),cannulation and adverse events were analyzed by using odds ratio(OR).Random and fixed effects models were used as appropriate.Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots.Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by calculating I2 measure of inconsistency.RESULTS:Seven randomized and seven non-randomized trials met inclusion criteria.Meta-analysis of RCTs showed a decrease trend for PEP with early precut sphincterotomy but was not statistically significant(OR=0.58;95%CI:0.32-1.05;P=0.07).No heterogeneity was noted among the studies with I2 of 0%.CONCLUSION:Early precut technique for common bile duct cannulation decreases the trend of post-ERCP pancreatitis. | Abhishek Choudhary Jessica Winn Sameer Siddique Murtaza Arif Zainab Arif Ghassan M Hammoud Srinivas R Puli Jamal A Ibdah Matthew L Bechtold | 2014 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2014，20，14： | 13 |
| 2 | Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection: A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM To perform meta-analysis of the use of Endocuff during average risk screening colonoscopy.METHODS Scopus, Cochrane databases, MEDLINE/Pub Med, and CINAHL were searched in April 2016. Abstracts from Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology, and the American College of Gastroenterology meeting were also searched from 2004-2015. Studies comparing EC-assisted colonoscopy(EAC) to standard colonoscopy, for any indication, were included in the analysis. The analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerS imonian and Laird models with the odds ratio(OR) to assess adenoma detection, cecal intubation rate, and complications performed. RESULTS Nine studies(n = 5624 patients) were included in the analysis. Compared to standard colonoscopy, procedures performed with EC had higher frequencies for adenoma(OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.23-1.80; P = 0.03), and sessile serrated adenomas detection(OR = 2.34 95%CI: 1.63-3.36; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cecal intubation rates between the EACgroup and standard colonoscopy(OR = 1.26, 95%CI: 0.70-2.27, I2 = 0%; P = 0.44). EAC was associated with a higher risk of complications, most commonly being superficial mucosal injury without higher frequency for perforation.CONCLUSION The use of an EC on colonoscopy appears to improve pre-cancerous polyp detection without any difference in cecal intubation rates compared to standard colonoscopy. | Matthew Chin William Karnes M Mazen Jamal John G Lee Robert Lee Jason Samarasena Matthew L Bechtold Douglas L Nguyen | 2016 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2016，22，43： | 4 |
| 3 | Prophylactic tracheal intubation for upper GI bleeding: A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM: To evaluate usefulness of prophylactically intubating upper gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB) patients. METHODS: UGIB results in a significant number of hospital admissions annually with endoscopy being the key intervention. In these patients, risks are associated with the bleeding and the procedure, including pulmonary aspiration. However, very little literature is available assessing the use of prophylactic endotracheal intubation on aspiration in these patients. A comprehensive search was performed in May 2014 in Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, Pub Med/Medline, Embase, and published abstracts from national gastroenterology meetings in the United States(2004-2014). Included studies examined UGIB patients and compared prophylactic intubation to no intubation before endoscopy. Meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.2 by Mantel-Haenszel and Der Simonian and Laird models with results presented as odds ratio for aspiration, pneumonia(within 48 h), and mortality. Funnel plots were utilized for publication bias and I2 measure of inconsistency for heterogeneity assessments. RESULTS: Initial search identified 571 articles. Of these articles, 10 relevant peer-reviewed articles in English and two relevant abstracts were selected to review by two independent authors(Almashhrawi AA and Bechtold ML). Of these studies, eight were excluded: Five did not have a control arm, one was a letter the editor, one was a survey study, and one was focused on prevention of UGIB. Therefore, four studies(N = 367) were included. Of the UGIB patients prophylactically intubated before endoscopy, pneumonia(within 48 h) was identified in 20 of 134(14.9%) patients as compared to 5 of 95(5.3%) patients that were not intubated prophylactically(P = 0.02). Despite observed trends, no significantdifferences were found for mortality(P = 0.18) or aspiration(P = 0.11).CONCLUSION: Pneumonia within 48 h is more likely in UGIB patients who received prophylactic endotracheal intubation prior to endoscopy. | Ashraf A Almashhrawi Rubayat Rahman Samuel T Jersak Akwi W Asombang Alisha M Hinds Hazem T Hammad Douglas L Nguyen Matthew L Bechtold | 2015 | World Journal of Meta-Analysis2015，3，1： | 1 |
| 4 | Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post - ERCP pancreatitis : a meta - analysis and systematic review显示文摘 | Choudhary A Bechtold M L Arif M | 2011 | Gastrointest Endosc2011，73，2： | 1 |
| 5 | Memory for implied versus directly stated advertising claims显示文摘 | Harris R J Trusty M L Bechtold J 1 and Wasinger L | 1989 | Psychnlogy & Marketing1989，6，2： | 1 |
| 6 | Bulk superconductivity in Tl2CaBa2Cu2O(8 + delta) up to 120 K显示文摘 | GAO L HUANG Z J MENG R L HOR P H BECHTOLD J SUN Y Y CHU C W SHENG Z Z HERMANN A M | 1988 | Nature1988，332，： | 1 |
| 7 | Effect of Helicobacter pylori treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD):meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials显示文摘 | Saad A M Choudhary A Bechtold M L | 2012 | Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology2012，47，2： | 1 |
| 8 | How good is endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating various T stages of recta cancer Meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘 | Puli S R Bechtold M L Reddy J B | 2009 | Ann Surg Oncol2009，16，2： | 1 |
| 9 | Effect of helicobacter pylori treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials显示文摘 | Saad A M Choudhary A Bechtold M L | 2012 | Scand J Gastroenterol2012，47，2： | 1 |
| 10 | Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis:a meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘 | Choudhary A Bechtold M L Arif M | | 0，，02： | 1 |
| 11 | Effect of Helicobacter py/or/ treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease ( GERD ) : meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials 显示文摘 | Saad A M Choudhary A Bechtold M L | 2012 | Scand J Gastroenterol2012，47，2： | 1 |
| 12 | Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘 | CHOUDHARY A BECHTOLD M L ARIF M | 2011 | Gastrointest Endosc2011，73，7： | 1 |
| 13 | Weekday vs weekend endoscopy: Is there a true difference in patient outcomes? A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the'weekend effect'on outcomes in patient admitted on the weekend for upper gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB).METHODS:A comprehensive search was performed(March 2014).Studies comparing weekend and weekday endoscopy in patients with UGIB were included.All studies had at least 2 of 3 primary outcomes which included:mortality,need for surgery,time to endoscopy,endoscopy on admission day,and length of hospital stay.Three authors individually extracted data.Metaanalysis was performed using pooled estimates with odds ratio or mean difference by fixed and random effects models.RESULTS:Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria.Patients admitted with UGIB on the weekend exhibited a statistically significant increase in mortality(OR=1.13;95%CI:1.06-1.20;P<0.01),need for surgery(OR=2.46;95%CI:1.51-3.99;P<0.01),and time to endoscopy(MD 2.68;95%CI:0.17-5.20;P=0.04)as compared to patients admitted with UGIB on a weekday.Furthermore,patients with UGIB admitted on weekend experienced statistically significant less endoscopy on day of admission(OR=0.72;95%CI:0.62-0.85;P<0.01).No difference was noted between the two groups for length of hospital stay(MD-1.29;95%CI:-3.03-0.45;P=0.15).CONCLUSION:A weekend effect seems to be apparent in patients with UGIB with significantly poorer outcomes. | Alisha M Hinds Dina Ahmad Kristi T Lopez Michelle L Matteson-Kome Matthew L Bechtold | 2014 | World Journal of Meta-Analysis2014，2，2： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员