2篇
您的检索式：作者名="Rohan Fernando"
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Tests of candidate genes in breed cross populations for QTL mapping in livestock显示文摘 | Honghua Zhao Max F. Rothschild Rohan L. Fernando Jack C. M. Dekkers | 2003 | Mammalian Genome2003，，7： | 1 |
| 2 | Mixture models detect large effect QTL better than GBLUP and result in more accurate and persistent predictions显示文摘Background: Accurate evaluation of SNP effects is important for genome wide association studies and for genomic prediction. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits differs widely, with some traits exhibiting few if any quantitative trait loci(QTL) with large effects, while other traits have one or several easily detectable QTL with large effects.Methods: Body weight in broilers and egg weight in layers are two examples of traits that have QTL of large effect.A commonly used method for genome wide association studies is to fit a mixture model such as Bayes B that assumes some known proportion of SNP effects are zero. In contrast, the most commonly used method for genomic prediction is known as GBLUP, which involves fitting an animal model to phenotypic data with the variance-covariance or genomic relationship matrix among the animals being determined by genome wide SNP genotypes. Genotypes at each SNP are typically weighted equally in determining the genomic relationship matrix for GBLUP. We used the equivalent marker effects model formulation of GBLUP for this study. We compare these two classes of models using egg weight data collected over 8 generations from 2,324 animals genotyped with a42 K SNP panel.Results: Using data from the first 7 generations, both Bayes B and GBLUP found the largest QTL in a similar well-recognized QTL region, but this QTL was estimated to account for 24 % of genetic variation with Bayes B and less than 1 % with GBLUP. When predicting phenotypes in generation 8 Bayes B accounted for 36 % of the phenotypic variation and GBLUP for 25 %. When using only data from any one generation, the same QTL was identified with Bayes B in all but one generation but never with GBLUP. Predictions of phenotypes in generations 2 to 7 based on only 295 animals from generation 1 accounted for 10 % phenotypic variation with Bayes B but only6 % with GBLUP. Predicting phenotype using only the marker effects in the 1 Mb region that accounted for the largest effect on egg weight from generation 1 data alone accounted for almost 8 % variation using Bayes B but had no predictive power with GBLUP.Conclusions: In conclusion, In the presence of large effect QTL, Bayes B did a better job of QTL detection and its genomic predictions were more accurate and persistent than those from GBLUP. | Anna Wolc Jesus Arango Petek Settar Janet E.Fulton Neil P.O'Sullivan Jack C.M.Dekkers Rohan Fernando Dorian J.Garrick | 2016 | Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology2016，7，4： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员