| 1 | Diagnosis of focal liver lesions with deep learning-based multichannel analysis of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging显示文摘BACKGROUND The nature of input data is an essential factor when training neural networks.Research concerning magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)-based diagnosis of liver tumors using deep learning has been rapidly advancing.Still,evidence to support the utilization of multi-dimensional and multi-parametric image data is lacking.Due to higher information content,three-dimensional input should presumably result in higher classification precision.Also,the differentiation between focal liver lesions(FLLs)can only be plausible with simultaneous analysis of multisequence MRI images.AIM To compare diagnostic efficiency of two-dimensional(2D)and three-dimensional(3D)-densely connected convolutional neural networks(DenseNet)for FLLs on multi-sequence MRI.METHODS We retrospectively collected T2-weighted,gadoxetate disodium-enhanced arterial phase,portal venous phase,and hepatobiliary phase MRI scans from patients with focal nodular hyperplasia(FNH),hepatocellular carcinomas(HCC)or liver metastases(MET).Our search identified 71 FNH,69 HCC and 76 MET.After volume registration,the same three most representative axial slices from all sequences were combined into four-channel images to train the 2D-DenseNet264 network.Identical bounding boxes were selected on all scans and stacked into 4D volumes to train the 3D-DenseNet264 model.The test set consisted of 10-10-10 tumors.The performance of the models was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUROC),specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive values(PPV),negative predictive values(NPV),and f1 scores.RESULTS The average AUC value of the 2D model(0.98)was slightly higher than that of the 3D model(0.94).Mean PPV,sensitivity,NPV,specificity and f1 scores(0.94,0.93,0.97,0.97,and 0.93)of the 2D model were also superior to metrics of the 3D model(0.84,0.83,0.92,0.92,and 0.83).The classification metrics of FNH were 0.91,1.00,1.00,0.95,and 0.95 using the 2D and 0.90,0.90,0.95,0.95,and 0.90 using the 3D models.The 2D and 3D networks'performance in the diagnosis of HCC were 1.00,0.80,0.91,1.00,and 0.89 and 0.88,0.70,0.86,0.95,and 0.78,respectively;while the evaluation of MET lesions resulted in 0.91,1.00,1.00,0.95,and 0.95 and 0.75,0.90,0.94,0.85,and 0.82 using the 2D and 3D networks,respectively.CONCLUSION Both 2D and 3D-DenseNets can differentiate FNH,HCC and MET with good accuracy when trained on hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced multi-sequence MRI volumes. | Róbert Stollmayer Bettina K Budai Ambrus Tóth IldikóKalina Erika Hartmann Péter Szoldán Viktor Bérczi Pál Maurovich-Horvat Pál N Kaposi | 2021 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2021，27，35： | 6 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员