|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Enhanced photochemical light utilization and decreased chilling‐induced photoinhibition of photosystem II in cotton overexpressing genes encoding chloroplast‐targeted antioxidant enzymes显示文摘 | DmytroKornyeyev Barry A.Logan PaxtonPayton Randy D.Allen A. ScottHoladay | 2008 | Physiologia Plantarum2008，，3： | 1 |
| 2 | A Malvaceae mystery: A mallow maelstrom of genome multiplications and maybe misleading methods?显示文摘Previous research suggests that Gossypium has undergone a 5-to 6-fold multiplication following its divergence from Theobroma. However, the number of events, or where they occurred in the Malvaceae phylogeny remains unknown. We analyzed transcriptomic and genomic data from representatives of eight of the nine Malvaceae subfamilies. Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear data placed Dombeya(Dombeyoideae) as sister to the rest of Malvadendrina clade, but the plastid DNA tree strongly supported Durio(Helicteroideae) in this position. Intraspecific Ks plots indicated that all sampled taxa, except Theobroma(Byttnerioideae), Corchorus(Grewioideae), and Dombeya(Dombeyoideae), have experienced whole genome multiplications(WGMs). Quartet analysis suggested WGMs were shared by Malvoideae-Bombacoideae and Sterculioideae-Tilioideae, but did not resolve whether these are shared with each other or Helicteroideae(Durio).Gene tree reconciliation and Bayesian concordance analysis suggested a complex history. Alternative hypotheses are suggested, each involving two independent autotetraploid and one allopolyploid event. They differ in that one entails an allopolyploid origin for the Durio lineage,whereas the other invokes an allopolyploid origin for Malvoideae-Bombacoideae. We highlight the need for more genomic information in the Malvaceae and improved methods to resolve complex evolutionary histories that may include allopolyploidy, incomplete lineage sorting, and variable rates of gene and genome evolution. | Justin L.Conover Nisa Karimi Noah Stenz Cecile Ane Corrinne E.Grover Cynthia Skema Jennifer A.Tate Kirsten Wolff Samuel A.Logan Jonathan F.Wendel David A.Baum | 2019 | Journal of Integrative Plant Biology2019，61，1： | 1 |
| 3 | Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation显示文摘 | BarbaraDemmig‐Adams William W.Adams III David H.Barker Barry A.Logan David R.Bowling Amy S.Verhoeven | 2008 | Physiologia Plantarum2008，，2： | 1 |
| 4 | Science and Medical Coverage in Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post:A Six-year Perspective显示文摘 | Robert A.Logan PengZengju Nancy F.Wilson | | 0，，01： | 1 |
| 5 | Outcomes following early red blood cell transfusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding显示文摘 | S. A.Hearnshaw R. F. A.Logan K. R.Palmer T. R.Card S. P. L.Travis M. F.Murphy | 2010 | Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics2010，，2： | 1 |
| 6 | Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance(VIPER) simulator显示文摘Background:This study evaluated the VIsion PERformance(VIPER)simulator’s ability to assess the functional visual performance in warfighters conducting civilian and military tasks.Methods:Thirty service members,aged 25–35 years old with a best corrected distance visual acuity(VA)better than or equal to 20/20 or logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR)0.00,were randomized to locate and identify road signs and mock improvised explosive devices(IEDs)under either daytime conditions or with infrared imagery,with(cc)and without(sc)wearing their habitual correction.Participants also underwent binocular uncorrected(UDVA)and corrected(CDVA)visual assessment,refraction,contrast sensitivity testing and wavefront aberrometry.Results:The mean age was 28.47 years.The manifest spherical equivalent was–3.16±1.75 diopters(D),the UDVA in both eyes(OU)was logMAR 0.83±0.47,and the CDVA OU was–0.11±0.06.For VIPER,the mean difference in the detection distance(DD)for road signs ccDD vs.scDD was(76.7±52.8)m(P<0.001).The average difference in identification distance(ID)ccID vs.scID was(13.9±6.3)m(P<0.001).The mean accuracies were 83.5%and 27.9%for cc and sc,respectively(P<0.001).The regression analysis indicated that a 1.6 m change in the distance accounts for a 1%change in the accuracy(P=0.002).Without correction,a 4.1 m change accounts for a 1%change in the accuracy(P<0.001).The average IED ccDD was(29.9±8.2)m,and that for scDD was(13.2±13.6)m(P<0.001).The average IED ccID was(32.2±6.2)m and that for the scID was(7.4±10.3)m(P<0.001).The mean IED identification accuracy was 46.7 and 11.4%for cc and sc,respectively(P<0.001).Conclusions:The preliminary results reflect VIPER’s ability to assess functional visual performance when detecting and identifying signs and IEDs.Furthermore,VIPER is able to detect performance changes with and without correction. | Denise S.Ryan Rose K.Sia Jennifer B.Eaddy Lorie A.Logan Jide O.Familoni Hind Beydoun Samantha B.Rodgers Bruce A.Rivers | 2020 | Military Medical Research2020，7，3： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员