维普中文期刊产品整合服务
1篇 您的检索式:作者名="Unchalee Permsuwan"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Cost-utility analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgery in severe aortic stenosis patients with intermediate surgical risk in Thailand显示文摘BACKGROUND Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation(TAVI) has been shown to provide comparable survival benefit and improvement in quality of life to surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR) for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis(AS) at intermediate surgical risk.This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of TAVI compared with SAVR for severe aortic stenosis with interme diate surgical risk in Thailand.METHODS A two-part constructed model was used to analyze lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years(QALYs) from societal and healthcare perspectives.The study cohort comprised severe AS patients at intermediate surgical risk with an average age of 80 years.The landmark trials were used to populate the model in terms of mortality and adverse event rates.All cost-related data and quality of life were based on Thai population.Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% armually and presented as2021 values.Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios(ICERs) were calculated.Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.RESULTS In comparison to SAVR,TAVI resulted in higher total cost(THB 1,717,132 [USD 52;415.51] vs.THB 893,524 [USD27,274.84]) and higher QALYs(4.88 vs.3.98) in a societal perspective.The estimated ICER was THB 906,937/QALY(USD27,684.27/QALY).From a healthcare system perspective,TAVI also had higher total cost than SAVR(THB 1,573,751 [USD48,038.79] vs.THB 726,342 [USD 22,171.63]) with similar QALYs gained to the societal perspective.The estimated ICER was THB933,145/QALY(USD 933,145/QALY).TAVI was not cost-effective at the Thai willingness to pay(WTP) threshold of THB160,000/QALY(USD 4,884/QALY).The results were sensitive to utility of either SAVR or TAVI treatment and cost of TAVI valve.CONCLUSION In patients with severe AS at intermediate surgical risk,TAVI is not a cost-effective strategy compared with SAVR at the WTP of THB 160;000/QALY(USD 4,884/QALY) from the perspectives of society and healthcare system.Unchalee Permsuwan Voratima Yoodee Wacin Buddhari Nattawut Wongpraparut Tasalak Thonghong Sirichai Cheewatanakornkul Krissada Meemook Pranya Sakiyalak Pongsanae Duangpakdee Jirawit Yadee 2022Journal of Geriatric Cardiology2022,19,11:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费