|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: Decreasing indication and changing trends显示文摘AIM: To evaluate the indication and outcome of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related liver transplantation(LT) in the era of newer antiviral agents.METHODS: We collected data on all patients who underwent transplantation at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center.These data included demographic,perioperative and long-term postoperative follow-up data including viral serological markers,HBV DNA,and repeated liver imaging.Between January 1990 and January 2012,133 patients(106 males and 27 females) underwent LT for HBV-related cirrhosis at our center.All patients were followed up frequently during the first year following transplantation,according to our standard protocol; follow-up visits occurred every 3-6 mo thereafter.Breakthrough infection was definedas re-emergence of HBV-DNA or hepatitis B surface antigen(HBs Ag) while on treatment.Five patients transplanted prior to 1992 did not receive immediate posttransplant anti-HBV prophylaxis; all other patients were treated with HBIG and at least one nucleos(t)ide analog.RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients underwent LT for HBV and were followed for a median of 82 mo(range: 1-274).The rates of post-LT survival and HBV recurrence during the follow-up period were 89% and 11%,respectively.The following factors were associated with disease recurrence: younger age(44.3 ± 16.2 years vs 51.4 ± 9.9 years,P = 0.02),positive pretransplant hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag)(60% vs 14%,P < 0.0001),detectable pretransplant HBV DNA(60% vs 27%,P = 0.03),positive posttransplant HBs Ag(80% vs 4%,P < 0.0001) and positive posttransplant HBe Ag(27% vs 1%,P < 0.0001).Forty-four(33%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).In the first(pre-2007) group,HBV was the second leading indication for LT after hepatitis C virus infection.A total of 64 transplants were performed,including 46(72%) for decompensated HBV cirrhosis,12(19%) for decompensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC and 6(10%) for compensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC.In the second group,nonalcoholic steatohepatitis surpassed HBV as the second leading indication for LT.A total of 69 HBV related transplants were performed,including 43(62%) for decompensated HBV cirrhosis,7(10%) for decompensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC and 19(27.5%) for compensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC.There was a significant(P = 0.007) increase in the number of transplants for compensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC.CONCLUSION: The use of potent anti-HBV agents has led to a changing trend in the indications for LT.HBV is currently the third leading indication for LT in this hyperendemic area. | Waleed Al-hamoudi Hussien Elsiesy Abdulrahman Bendahmash Nasser Al-masri Safiyya Ali Naglaa Allam Mohammed Al Sofayan Hamad Al Bahili Mohammed Al Sebayel Dieter Broering Sammy Saab Faisal Abaalkhail | 2015 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2015,21,26: | 4 |
| 2 | 在生活施主肝移植的施主的 Day-of-surgery 拒绝显示文摘 AIM: To study diagnostic laparoscopy as a tool for excluding donors on the day of surgery in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).METHODS: This study analyzed prospectively collected data from all potential donors for LDLT. All of the donors were subjected to a three-step donor evaluation protocol at our institution. Step one consisted of a clinical and social evaluation, including a liver profile, hepatitis markers, a renal profile, a complete blood count, and an abdominal ultrasound with Doppler. Step two involved tests to exclude liver diseases and to evaluate the donor’s serological status. This step also included a radiological evaluation of the biliary anatomy and liver vascular anatomy using magnetic resonance cholan-giopanc reatography and a computed tomography (CT) angiogram, respectively. A CT volumetric study was used to calculate the volume of the liver parenchyma. Step three included an ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Between November 2002 and May 2009, sixty-nine potential living donors were assessed by open exploration prior to harvesting the planned part of the liver. Between the end of May 2009 and October 2010, 30 potential living donors were assessed laparoscopically to determine whether to proceed with the abdominal incision to harvest part of the liver for donation. RESULTS: Ninety-nine living donor liver transplants were attempted at our center between November 2002 and October 2010. Twelve of these procedures were aborted on the day of surgery (12.1%) due to donor findings, and eighty-seven were completed (87.9%). These 87 liver transplants were divided into the following groups: Group A, which included 65 transplants that were performed between November 2002 and May 2009, and Group B, which included 22 transplants that were performed between the end of May 2009 and October 2010. The demographic data for the two groups of donors were found to match; moreover, no significant difference was observed between the two groups of donors with respect to hospital stay, nar-cotic and non-narcotic analgesia requirements or the incidence of complications. Regarding the recipients, our study clearly revealed that there was no significant difference in either the incidence of different complications or the incidence of retransplantation between the two groups. Day-of-surgery donor assessment for LDLT procedures at our center has passed through two eras,open and laparoscopic. In the first era, sixty-nine LDLT procedures were attempted between November 2002 and May 2009. Upon open exploration of the donors on the day of surgery, sixty-five donors were found to have livers with a grossly normal appearance. Four donors out of 69 (5.7%) were rejected on the day of surgery because their livers were grossly fatty and pale. In the laparoscopic era, thirty LDLT procedures were attempted between the end of May 2009 and October 2010. After the laparoscopic assessment on the day of surgery, twenty-two transplantation procedures were completed (73.4%), and eight were aborted (26.6%). Our data showed that the levels of steatosis in the rejected donors were in the acceptable range. Moreover, the results of the liver biopsies of rejected donors were comparable between the group A and group B donors. The laparoscopic assessment of donors presents many advantages relative to the assessment of donors through open exploration; in particular, the laparo-scopic assessment causes less pain, requires a shorter hospital stay and leads to far superior cosmetic results. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic assessment of donors in LDLT is a safe and acceptable procedure that avoids unnecessary large abdominal incisions and increases the chance of achieving donor safety. | Bassem Hegab Mohamed Rabei Abdelfattah Ayman Azzam Hazem Mohamed Waleed Al Hamoudi Faisal Aba Alkhail Hamad Al Bahili Hatem Khalaf Mohammed Al Sofayan Mohammed Al Sebayel | 2012 | World Journal of Hepatology2012,4,11: | 1 |
| 3 | Liver transplantation in Wilson's disease: Single center experience from Saudi Arabia显示文摘AIM: To determine liver transplantation outcomes in Wilson's disease (WD) patients, focusing on neurological manifestations. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed data from 16 WD patients (nine males, 56%) who had liver transplants between 1991 and 2007. Survival, graft function, and neurological complications were assessed during a follow-up period of up to 15 years. In addition, each patient's medical record was reviewed in detail to find the type of Wilson's disease (hepatic or hepatic plus neurological WD), indication for liver transplantation, use of chelating agents prior to transplantation, immediate and long term complications following transplantation, the donor details, and the pathology of explanted liver. RESULTS: End-stage liver disease was the indication for transplantation in all 16 WD patients. Four patients displayed WD-related neurological symptoms in addition to liver disease. Living-related liver transplantation was done in three cases. One patient died on postoperative day 6 due to primary graft non-function. Oneyear post liver transplant survival was 94%. Neurological manifestations of all four patients disappeared during their follow-up. Four patients developed acute cellular rejection, but all responded to treatment. One patient developed chronic ductopenic rejection after 15 years post-transplantation and their graft failed; this patient is currently waiting for re-transplantation. Fourteen patients (88%) are still living. The long-term average survival is currently 10.5 years, with a current median survival of 8 years. Long-term graft survival is currently 81%. CONCLUSION: Shortand long-term survival in WD patient liver transplantation was excellent, and neurological and psychological WD manifestations disappeared during long-term follow-up. | Musthafa Chalikandy Peedikayil Hamad Ibrahim Al Ashgar Abdullah Al Mousa Mohammed Al Sebayel Khalid Al Kahtani Faisal Aba Alkhail | 2013 | World Journal of Hepatology2013,5,3: | 1 |