|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Severe Neutropenia After Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Mitomycin C显示文摘 | Laura A. Lambert Terri S. Armstrong J. Jack Lee Suyu Liu Matthew H. G. Katz Cathy Eng Robert A. Wolff Melissa L. Tortorice Pier Tansey Santiago Gonzalez-Moreno Donald H. Lambert Paul F. Mansfield | 2009 | Annals of Surgical Oncology2009，，： | 1 |
| 2 | Phospholipid hydrolysis in a pharmaceutical emulsion assessed by physicochemical parameters and a new analytical method显示文摘 | Laura Rabinovich-Guilatt Catherine Dubernet Karen Gaudin Gregory Lambert Patrick Couvreur Pierre Chaminade | 2005 | European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics2005，，1： | 1 |
| 3 | Looking up: Recent advances in understanding and treating peritoneal carcinomatosis显示文摘 | Laura A. Lambert | 2015 | CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians2015，，4： | 1 |
| 4 | Molecular evolution of hemojuvelin and the repulsive guidance molecule family 显示文摘 | Laura Marie Camus Lisa A Lambert | 2007 | J Mol Evol2007，65，1： | 1 |
| 5 | Comparison of open and closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Results from the United States hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy collaborative显示文摘BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery(CRS)with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC)for peritoneal carcinomatosis can be performed in two ways:Open or closed abdominal technique.AIM To evaluate the impact of HIPEC method on post-operative and long-term survival outcomes.METHODS Patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC from 2000-2017 were identified in the United States HIPEC collaborative database.Post-operative,recurrence,and overall survival outcomes were compared between those who received open vs closed HIPEC.RESULTS Of the 1812 patients undergoing curative-intent CRS and HIPEC,372(21%)patients underwent open HIPEC and 1440(79%)underwent closed HIPEC.There was no difference in re-operation or severe complications between the two groups.Closed HIPEC had higher rates of 90-d readmission while open HIPEC had a higher rate of 90-d mortalities.On multi-variable analysis,closed HIPEC technique was not a significant predictor for overall survival(hazards ratio:0.75,95%confidence interval:0.51-1.10,P=0.14)or recurrence-free survival(hazards ratio:1.39,95%confidence interval:1.00-1.93,P=0.05)in the entire cohort.These findings remained consistent in the appendiceal and the colorectal subgroups.CONCLUSION In this multi-institutional analysis,the HIPEC method was not independently associated with relevant post-operative or long-term outcomes.HIPEC technique may be left to the discretion of the operating surgeon. | Jennifer L Leiting Jordan M Cloyd Ahmed Ahmed Keith Fournier Andrew J Lee Sophie Dessureault Seth Felder Jula Veerapong Joel M Baumgartner Callisia Clarke Harveshp Mogal Charles A Staley Mohammad Y Zaidi Sameer H Patel Syed A Ahmad Ryan J Hendrix Laura Lambert Daniel E Abbott Courtney Pokrzywa Mustafa Raoof Christopher J LaRocca Fabian M Johnston Jonathan Greer Travis E Grotz | 2020 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology2020，12，7： | 1 |
| 6 | PSOGI和ESSO之间的教育联盟:欧洲大陆的培训经验和模式显示文摘既往腹膜表面肿瘤学科的培训常通过医师的个人自学实现,鉴于目前这一学科的发展,对该领域专家的需求越来越大,因此有必要形成组织化的教育和培训方式。在欧洲外科肿瘤学会(ESSO)和国际腹膜表面恶性肿瘤学会(Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International,PSOGI)的共同努力下,欧洲腹膜表面肿瘤学院(ESPSO)于2014年成立。该组织基于导师制的腹膜表面肿瘤学培训项目,已获得欧洲认证。自该项目成立年至2021年7月14日,共有42名外科医生从该培训项目毕业,其中大多数来自欧洲,也有部分非欧洲的毕业生,这使得该项目具有全球影响力。目前,已有35名候选学员已在欧洲和非欧洲培训中心完成注册。鉴于当前培训的成功,该项目正在加速发展,目前不断有新的教员加入以及新的培训活动开展。欧洲腹膜表面肿瘤学学院成功建立了一个结构化的基于导师制的培训项目,并获得了专业认证。得益于来自全球的大量毕业生和候选学员,使该项目获得了预期的声望,满足了学员的需求,并为本培训项目下一步计划的实施提供了保障。本文主要介绍此培训项目方案。 | Santiago Gonzalez-Moreno Marcello Deraco Shigeki Kusamura Lana Bijelic Ana Galan Frederic Bibeau Clarisse Dromain Laura Lambert Winston Liauw Paul HSugarbaker 高超(翻译) 李雁(审校) | 2022 | 中国肿瘤临床2022，49，24： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员