|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG NONCOOPERATIVE AND COALITION STABILITY CONCEPTS显示文摘Insightful theorems are established on interrelationships among coalition and noncooperative stability concepts defined within the paradigm of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution.More specifically,the newly defined coalition stability definitions that are considered are coalition Nash stability(CNash),coalition general metarationality(CGMR),coalition symmetric metarationality (CSMR)and coalition sequential stability(CSEQ),along with their earlier-defined noncooperative versions.A range of interesting new theorems are derived to establish connections among these coalition stability concepts as well as between noncooperative and coalition stability definitions. Applications with respect to the games of Prisoner′s Dilemma and Chicken,as well as a groundwater contamination dispute,demonstrate how the various stability definitions can be applied in practice and confirm the validity of some of the theorems as well as point out,by example,certain types of relationships which cannot hold. | Takehiro INOHARA Keith W.HIPEL | 2008 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2008，17，1： | 13 |
| 2 | DOMINATING ATTITUDES IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION显示文摘为分析称在冲突的制造者态度被介绍并且适用于达成一个 brownfield 性质的公平转移的问题的一个决定的重要性的正式方法论。他的对手的制造者态度在他他的自己的偏爱的考虑被表示的一个决定,以及那些。统治态度被用来建议在一个决定制造者由于他的态度在考虑多重观点的一种情形,他可以更重重地赞成一个观点。brownfield 获得冲突的分析说明这方法论揭示的卓见的类型。 | Sean Bernath WALKER Keith W.HIPEL Takehiro INOHARA | 2012 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2012，21，3： | 6 |
| 3 | FUZZY PREFERENCES IN CONFLICTS显示文摘一条系统的模糊途径被开发在涉及冲突的决定制造者的偏爱为模糊和不确定性建模。这唯一的模糊偏爱明确的表达为给定的争论以决定制造者在被建模的冲突分辨率在图模型的范例以内被使用,每个决定制造者是行动或选择,并且每个决定制造者是有关能发生的状态或结果的偏爱。以便能为每个决定制造者和可能的 equilibria 或分辨率决定每个状态的稳定性,在冲突下面描述潜在的人的行为的解决方案概念的一个范围与模糊偏爱为使用被定义。更明确地,稳定性的强壮、弱的定义被为概念把将军纳什称为的答案提供元合理的、对称的元合理、顺序的稳定性。为了说明这些答案概念怎么能方便地被使用在,练习,他们被位于 Elmira 的一个化学公司在含水土层的污染上用于争论,安大略,加拿大。 | Mubarak S.AL-MUTAIRI Keith W.HIPEL Mohamed S.KAMEL | 2008 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2008，17，3： | 5 |
| 4 | STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING FOR IMPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY:COALITIONS AND ATTITUDES显示文摘The utilization of decision support systems which are flexible enough to handle information about cooperative behavior and stakeholder attitudes are useful for analyzing complex social conflicts.One such conflict which arose from the redevelopment of a private brownfield property in Kitchener,Ontario,Canada is examined using such a decision support tool.Specifically,a formal model referred to as COAT which allows for the examination of conflicts with both coalition and attitude properties is rigorously defined and then implemented within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution in order that insights may be gained on how the decision makers can reach win-win resolutions. | Sean BERNATH WALKER Keith W.HIPEL Takehiro INOHARA | 2009 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2009，18，4： | 3 |
| 5 | ROBUSTNESS OF EQUILIBRIA IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION显示文摘A novel approach for assessing the robustness of an equilibrium in conflict resolution is presented.Roughly,an equilibrium is robust if it is resilient,or resistant to deviation.Robustness assessment is based on a new concept called Level of Freedom,which evaluates the relative freedom of a decision maker to escape an equilibrium.Resolutions of a conflict can be affected by changes in decision makers' preferences,which may destabilize an equilibrium,causing the conflict to evolve.Hence,a conflict may become long-term and thereby continue to evolve,even after reaching an equilibrium.The new robustness measure is used to rank equilibria based on robustness,to facilitate distinguishing equilibria that are relatively sustainable.An absolutely robust equilibrium is a special case in which the level of freedom is at an absolute minimum for each individual stability definition. | Yasser T.Matbouli D.Marc Kilgour Keith W.Hipel | 2015 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2015，24，4： | 3 |
| 6 | A Two-Level Hierarchical Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Application to International Climate Change Negotiations显示文摘A novel two-level hierarchical graph model is developed to analyze international climate change negotiations with hierarchical structures:the negotiations take place between two nations and between each nation and its provincial governments.The two national government are two decision makers at the top level.Within each nation,the two provincial governments negotiate with the national government at the lower level.The theoretical structure of this novel model,including decision makers,options,moves,and preference relations,are developed.The interrelationship between the stabilities in the two-level hierarchical graph model and the stabilities in local models are investigated by theorems.These theorems can be utilized to calculate complete stabilities in the two-level hierarchical graph model when the stabilities in local graph models are known.The international climate change negotiations as the illustrative example is then investigated in detail.The extra equilibrium,uniquely obtained by this novel methodology,suggests that opposition may still be from one provincial government when the national government does not sign the international climate agreement and implements existing environmental laws.Compared with other approaches,this novel methodology is an effective and flexible tool in analyzing hierarchical conflicts at two levels by providing decision makers with strategic resolutions with broader vision. | Shawei He Keith W.Hipel Haiyan Xu Ye Chen | 2020 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2020，29，3： | 1 |
| 7 | Attitude‐based strategic negotiation for conflict management in construction projects显示文摘 | SaiedYousefi Keith W.Hipel TarekHegazy | 2010 | Proj Mgmt Jrnl2010，，4： | 1 |
| 8 | A PERSONAL MEMOIR OF WEIMIN ZHENG-“A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS”显示文摘In 1951 Professor Weimin Zheng returned to the People's Republic of China from the United Kingdom to assist in building his country into a modern nation.Rather than pursue a doctoral degree at the California Institute of Technology, or Caltech as it is popularly called,Professor Zheng,unselfishly and patriotically,decided that he would devote his many talents to providing a first-class education to Chinese students within a strong university system.In particular。 | Keith W.HIPEL | 2013 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2013，22，4： | 0 |
| 9 | Theory and Implementation of Sensitivity Analyses Based on Their Algebraic Representation in the Graph Model显示文摘Sensitivity analyses based on an algebraic representation in the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) are generalized for ascertaining the robustness of stability results by varying decision makers' preference ranking.The ordinal preferences in GMCR are advantageous to carry out sensitivity analyses with respect to systematically identifying the influence of preference alterations upon the four basic stabilities consisting of Nash stability,general metarationality,symmetric metarationality and sequential stability.The proposed algebraic representation of the four basic stabilities is not only effective and convenient for computer implementation of sensitivity analysis,but also makes it easier to understand the meaning of the four stabilities when compared with the existing matrix representation.Further,these sensitivity analyses results are embedded into the latest version of the decision support system NUAAGMCR,which can be used to study real-world conflicts.To illustrate how these contributions to sensitivity analyses can be applied in practice and provide valuable strategic insights,they are used to investigate the civil war conflict in South Sudan. | Jinshuai Zhao Haiyan Xu Keith W.Hipel Baohua Yang | 2019 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2019，28，5： | 0 |
| 10 | Classifying Metarational Stabilities in Conflicts显示文摘New solution concepts for n-decision maker conflicts based on generalized metarationalities for modelling possible human behaviour under conflict are proposed.A classification of these solution concepts,also called stability definitions,is presented both to simplify understanding and to illustrate important differences among different stability regimes.The relationships among solution concepts are explored and new,more specific results are obtained in the comparison among existing stability concepts and the newly proposed ones.An informative example is used to demonstrate the applicability and insights of these solution concepts. | Amanda Garcia Keith W.Hipel Amer Obeidi | 2019 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2019，28，3： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员