|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | First dark matter search results from the PandaX-Ⅰ experiment显示文摘We report on the first dark-matter(DM)search results from PandaX-I,a low threshold dual-phase xenon experiment operating at the China JinPing Underground Laboratory.In the 37-kg liquid xenon target with 17.4 live-days of exposure,no DM particle candidate event was found.This result sets a stringent limit for low-mass DM particles and disfavors the interpretation of previously-reported positive experimental results.The minimum upper limit,3.7×10-44cm2,for the spin-independent isoscalar DM-particle-nucleon scattering cross section is obtained at a DM-particle mass of 49 GeV/c2at 90%confidence level. | XIAO MengJiao XIAO Xiang ZHAO Li CAO XiGuang CHEN Xun CHEN YunHua CUI XiangYi FANG DeQing FU ChangBo GIBONI Karl L. GONG HaoWei GUO GuoDong HU Jie HUANG XingTao JI XiangDong JU YongLin LEI SiAo LI ShaoLi LIN Qing LIU HuaXuan LIU JiangLai LIU Xiang LORENZON Wolfgang MA YuGang MAO YaJun NI KaiXuan PUSHKIN Kirill REN XiangXiang SCHUBNELL Michael SHEN ManBing STEPHENSON Scott TAN AnDi TARL Greg WANG HongWei WANG JiMin WANG Meng WANG XuMing WANG Zhou WEI YueHuan WU ShiYong XIE PengWei YOU YingHui ZENG XiongHui ZHANG Hua ZHANG Tao ZHU ZhongHua | 2014 | Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy)2014，57，11： | 10 |
| 2 | PandaX: a liquid xenon dark matter experiment at CJPL显示文摘PandaX is a large liquid-xenon detector experiment usable for direct dark-matter detection and 136Xe double-beta decay search.The central vessel was designed to accommodate a staged target volume increase from initially 120 kg(stage I)to 0.5 t(stage II)and eventually to a multi-ton scale.The experiment is located in the Jinping Deep-Underground Laboratory in Sichuan,China.The detector operates in dual-phase mode,allowing detection of both prompt scintillation,and ionization charge through proportional scintillation.In this paper a detailed description of the stage I detector design and performance as well as results established during the commissioning phase are presented. | CAO XiGuang CHEN Xun CHEN YunHua CUI XiangYi FANG DeQing FU ChangBo GIBONI Karl L. GONG HaoWei GUO GuoDong HE Ming HU Jie HUANG XingTao JI XiangDong JU YongLin LI ShaoLi LIN Qing LIU HuaXuan LIU JiangLai LIU Xiang LORENZON Wolfgang MA YuGang MAO YaJun NI KaiXuan PUSHKIN Kirill REN XiangXiang SCHUBNELL Michael SHEN ManBing SHI YuJie STEPHENSON Scott TAN AnDi TARLé Greg WANG HongWei WANG JiMing WANG Meng WANG XuMing WANG Zhou WEI YueHuan WU ShiYong XIAO MengJiao XIAO Xiang XIE PengWei YE Tao YOU YingHui ZEN XiongHui ZHANG Hua ZHANG Tao ZHAO HaiYing ZHAO Li ZHOU XiaoPeng ZHU ZhongHua | 2014 | Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy)2014，57，8： | 9 |
| 3 | Does training and experience influence the accuracy of computed tomography colonography interpretation?显示文摘AIM: To evaluate the effect of experience on the accuracy rate of computed tomography colonography(CTC) interpretation and patient preferences/satisfaction for CTC and colonoscopy. METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized, observational study performed in a single, tertiary care center involving 90 adults who underwent CTC followed by colonoscopy on the same day. CTC was interpreted by an abdominal imaging radiologist and then a colonoscopy was performed utilizing segmental un-blinding and re-examination as required. A radiology resident and two gastroenterology(GI) fellows blinded to the results also interpreted the CTC datasets independently. Accuracy rates and trend changes were determined for each reader to assess for a learning curve. RESULTS: Among 90 patients(57% male) aged 55 ± 8.9 years, 39 polyps ≥ 6 mm were detected in 20 patients and 13 polyps > 9 mm in 10 patients. Accuracy rates were 88.9%(≥ 6 mm) and 93.3%(> 9 mm) for the GI Radiologist, 89.8%(≥ 6 mm) and 98.9%(> 9 mm) for the Radiology Resident and 86.7% and 95.6%(≥ 6 mm) and 87.8% and 94.4%(> 9 mm) for each of the GI fellows respectively. The reader's accuracy rate did not change significantly with the percentage change rate ranging between-1.7 to 0.9(P = 0.12 to 0.56). Patients considered colonoscopy more satisfactory than CTC(30% vs 4%, P < 0.0001), they felt less anxiety during colonoscopy(36% vs 7%, P < 0.0001), they experienced less pain or discomfort during colonoscopy compared to CTC(69% vs 4%, P < 0.0001) and colonoscopy was preferred by 77% of the participants as a repeat screening test for the future. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant learning curve was identified in CTC interpretation suggesting that further study is required to identify the necessary training to adequately interpret CTC scans. | Greg Rosenfeld Yi Tzu Nancy Fu Brendan Quiney Hong Qian Darin Krygier Jacquie Brown Patrick Vos Pari Tiwari Jennifer Telford Brian Bressler Robert Enns | 2014 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2014，20，6： | 2 |
| 4 | An Au/Si hetero-nanorod-based biosensor for Salmonella detection显示文摘 | Fu Junxue Park Bosoon Siragusa Greg | 2008 | Nanotechnology2008，19，155502： | 1 |
| 5 | Progressive skyline computation in database systems 显示文摘 | Papadias D Tao Yufei Fu Greg | 2005 | ACM Trans on Database Systems2005，30，1： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员