2篇
您的检索式：作者名="Dexter Seow"
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Ankle arthrodesis:A systematic approach and review of the literature显示文摘Ankle arthrodesis is a common treatment used for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis(ESAA). The surgical goal of ankle arthrodesis is to obtain bony union between the tibia and talus with adequate alignment [slight valgus(0°-5°)], neutral dorsiflexion, and slight external rotation positions) in order to provide a pain-free plantigrade foot for weightbearing activities. There are many variations in operative technique including deferring approaches(open or arthroscopic) and differing fixation methods(internal or external fixation). Each technique has its advantage and disadvantages. Success of ankle arthrodesis can be dependent on several factors, including patient selection, surgeons' skills, patient comorbidities, operative care, etc. However, from our experience, the majority of ESAA patients obtain successful clinical outcomes. This review aims to outline the indications and goals of arthrodesis for treatment of ESAA and discuss both open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. A systematic step by step operative technique guide is presented for both the arthroscopic and open approaches including a postoperative protocol. We review the current evidence supporting each approach. The review finishes with a report of the most recent evidence of outcomes after both approaches and concerns regarding the development of hindfoot arthritis. | Youichi Yasui Charles P Hannon Dexter Seow John G Kennedy | 2016 | World Journal of Orthopedics2016，7，11： | 5 |
| 2 | Systematic review of bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesion of talus-evaluation for level and quality of clinical studies显示文摘AIM To clarify the quality of the studies indicating lesion size and/or containment as prognostic indicators of bone marrow stimulation(BMS) for osteochondral lesions of the talus(OLT). METHODS Two reviewers searched the Pub Med/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using specific terms on March 2015 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Predetermined variables were extracted for all the included studies. Level of evidence(LOE) was determined using previously published criteria by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and methodological quality of evidence (MQOE) was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS This review included 22 studies. Overall, 21 of the 22(95.5%) included studies were level Ⅳ or level Ⅲ evidences. The remaining study was a level Ⅱ evidence. MQOE analysis revealed 14 of the 22(63.6%) included studies having fair quality, 7(31.8%) studies having poor quality and only 1 study having excellent quality. CONCLUSION The evidence supporting the use of lesion size and containment as prognostic indicators of BMS for OLTs has been shown to be of low quality. | Youichi Yasui Laura Ramponi Dexter Seow Eoghan T Hurley Wataru Miyamoto Yoshiharu Shimozono John G Kennedy | 2017 | World Journal of Orthopedics2017，8，12： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员