维普中文期刊产品整合服务
1篇 您的检索式:作者名="Daniel Corsilli"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome显示文摘AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS).METHODS Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were recruited in an academic 24-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit. Random sequential administration of i NO(20 ppm) or nebulized epoprostenol(10 μg/mL) was done in all patients. Thereafter, inhaled milrinone(1 mg/mL) alone followed by inhaled milrinone in association with inhaled nitric oxide(iN O) was administered. A jet nebulization device synchronized with the mechanical ventilation was use to administrate the epoprostenol and the milrinone. Hemodynamic measurements and partial pressure of arterial oxygen(PaO_2) were recorded before and after each inhaled therapyadministration.RESULTS The majority of ARDS were of pulmonary cause(n = 13) and pneumonia(n = 7) was the leading underlying initial disease. Other pulmonary causes of ARDS were: Post cardiopulmonary bypass(n = 2), smoke inhalation injury(n = 1), thoracic trauma and pulmonary contusions(n = 2) and aspiration(n = 1). Two patients had an extra pulmonary cause of ARDS: A polytrauma patient and an intra-abdominal abscess Inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone and the combination of inhaled milrinone and i NO had no impact on systemic hemodynamics. No significant adverse events related to study medications were observed. The median increase of PaO 2 from baseline was 8.8 mmH g [interquartile range(IQR) = 16.3], 6.0 mm Hg(IQR = 18.4), 6 mm Hg(IQR = 15.8) and 9.2 mm Hg(IQR = 20.2) respectively with i NO, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone, and i NO added to milrinone. Only i NO and the combination of inhaled milrinone and i NO had a statistically significant effect on PaO 2. CONCLUSION When comparing the effects of inhaled NO, milrinone and epoprostenol, only NO significantly improved oxygenation. Inhaled milrinone appeared safe but failed to improve oxygenation in ARDS.Martin Albert Daniel Corsilli David R Williamson Marc Brosseau Patrick Bellemare Stéphane Delisle Anne QN Nguyen France Varin 2017World Journal of Critical Care Medicine2017,6,1:4
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费