|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Clinical trial: prolonged beneficial effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on dyspepsia consultations – the Bristol Helicobacter Project显示文摘 | R. F.Harvey J. A.Lane P.Nair M.Egger I.Harvey J.Donovan L.Murray | 2010 | Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics2010，，3： | 1 |
| 2 | 2021年ISHNE/HRS/EHRA/APHRS关于移动医疗心律失常管理共识:心脏节律专业人员的数字医疗工具显示文摘国际动态心电图和无创心电图学会/心律学会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会制定的'关于移动医疗心律失常管理共识'描述了移动医疗(mHealth)技术在心律失常管理中的现状,涉及数字医疗工具范围,以及可能应用于心律失常的诊断和协助临床决策。合并症和生活方式管理(日益公认在心律失常中起作用)以及患者自我管理赋予了mHealth新的内容。共识对预测分析的承诺,以及嵌入了mHealth的常规临床关怀的操作面临的挑战,进行了探讨。 | Niraj Varma Iwona Cygankiewicz Mintu Turakhia Hein Heidbuchel Yufeng Hu Lin Yee Chen Jean-Philippe Couderc Edmond M.Cronin Jerry D.Estep Lars Grieten Deirdre A.Lane Reena Mehra Alex Page Rod Passman Jonathan Piccini Ewa Piotrowicz Ryszard Piotrowicz Pyotr G.Platonov Antonio Luiz Ribeiro Robert E.Rich Andrea M.Russo David Slotwiner Jonathan S.Steinberg Emma Svennberg 蔡星星(翻译) 陈牧(翻译) 陈泰中(翻译) 费聿东(翻译) 费振涛(翻译) 龚畅祺(翻译) 胡晓亮(翻译) 李澄(翻译) 练小铭(翻译) 莫斌峰(翻译) 王海成(翻译) 王倩(翻译) 卫郅星(翻译) 徐全福(翻译) 杨眉(翻译) 杨钰粒(翻译) 于怡驰(翻译) 张睿(翻译) 赵铭哲(翻译) 赵晏(翻译) 李毅刚(审校) 王群山(审校) | 2021 | 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志2021，35，2： | 1 |
| 3 | Outcomes of surgical treatment for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta‐analysis显示文摘 | Mohammad HassanMurad M. M.Fernández‐Balsells AmeliaBarwise Juan F.Gallegos‐Orozco AnuPaul Melanie A.Lane Julianna F.Lampropulos InésNatividad LilisbethPerestelo‐Pérez Paula G.Ponce de León‐Lovatón Felipe N.Albuquerque JanteyCarey Patricia J.Erwin Victor M | 2010 | Clinical Endocrinology2010，，6： | 1 |
| 4 | Evidence that high von Willebrand factor and low ADAMTS‐13 levels independently increase the risk of a non‐fatal heart attack显示文摘 | J. T. B.CRAWLEY D. A.LANE M.WOODWARD A.RUMLEY G. D. O.LOWE | 2008 | Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis2008，，4： | 1 |
| 5 | Under the Microscope:Understanding,Detecting and Preventing Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion显示文摘 | Richard A.Lane | | 0，，01： | 1 |
| 6 | Respiratory plasticity following spinal cord injury:perspectives from mouse to man显示文摘The study of respiratory plasticity in animal models spans decades.At the bench,researchers use an array of techniques aimed at harnessing the power of plasticity within the central nervous system to restore respiration following spinal cord injury.This field of research is highly clinically relevant.People living with cervical spinal cord injury at or above the level of the phrenic motoneuron pool at spinal levels C3-C5 typically have significant impairments in breathing which may require assisted ventilation.Those who are ventilator dependent are at an increased risk of ventilator-associated co-morbidities and have a drastically reduced life expectancy.Pre-clinical research examining respiratory plasticity in animal models has laid the groundwork for clinical trials.Despite how widely researched this injury is in animal models,relatively few treatments have broken through the preclinical barrier.The three goals of this present review are to define plasticity as it pertains to respiratory function post-spinal cord injury,discuss plasticity models of spinal cord injury used in research,and explore the shift from preclinical to clinical research.By investigating current targets of respiratory plasticity research,we hope to illuminate preclinical work that can influence future clinical investigations and the advancement of treatments for spinal cord injury. | Katherine C.Locke Margo L.Randelman Daniel J.Hoh Lyandysha V.Zholudeva Michael A.Lane | 2022 | Neural Regeneration Research2022，17，10： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员