| 1 | Field performance of alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation on tomato crop growth, yield, water use efficiency, quality and profitability显示文摘Sustainable irrigation method is now essential for adaptation and adoption in the areas where water resources are limited. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to test the performance of alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation(AWDFI) on crop growth, yield, water use efficiency(WUE), fruit quality and profitability analysis of tomato. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with six treatments replicated thrice during the dry seasons of 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Irrigation water was applied through three ways of furrow: AWDFI, fixed wetting and drying furrow irrigation(FWDFI) and traditional(every) furrow irrigation(TFI). Each irrigation method was divided into two levels: irrigation up to 100 and 80% field capacity(FC). Results showed that plant biomass(dry matter) and marketable fruit yield of tomato did not differ significantly between the treatments of AWDFI and TFI, but significant difference was observed in AWDFI and in TFI compared to FWDFI at same irrigation level. AWDFI saved irrigation water by 35 to 38% for the irrigation levels up to 80 and 100% FC, compared to the TFI, respectively. AWDFI improved WUE by around 37 to 40% compared to TFI when irrigated with 100 and 80% FC, respectively. Fruit quality(total soluble solids and pulp) was found greater in AWDFI than in TFI. Net return from AWDFI technique was found nearly similar compared to TFI and more than FWDFI. The benefit cost ratio was viewed higher in AWDFI than in TFI and FWDFI by 2.8, 8.7 and 11, 10.4% when irrigation water was applied up to 100 and 80% FC, respectively. Unit production cost was obtained lower in AWDFI compared to TFI and FWDFI. However, AWDFI is a useful water-saving furrow irrigation technique which may resolve as an alternative choice compared with TFI in the areas where available water and supply methods are limited to irrigation. | Khokan Kumer Sarker M.A.R.Akanda S.K.Biswas D.K.Roy A.Khatun M.A.Goffar | 2016 | Journal of Integrative Agriculture2016，15，10： | 6 |
| 2 | 非离子表面活性剂理化特性与黄麻子叶培养幼芽再生促进作用的关系显示文摘非离子表面活性剂PluronicF6 8、吐温 2 0、曲通X - 1 0 0对圆果种黄麻带叶柄子叶离体培养幼芽再生效果的影响进行了研究。选用这组非离子表面活性剂目的在于明确其各自独特理化特性与黄麻子叶培养器官形态建成之间可能的关系。添加 0 .0 0 1 - 0 .5(w/v)PluronicF6 8可增加子叶平均出苗百分率和每子叶出苗数 ,附加 0 .5% (W/V)达到最大效果。而添加 0 .0 0 1 %吐温 2 0可达到最佳效果 ,附加 0 .5%则抑制幼苗形成。离体子叶附加 0 .0 0 1 % (V/V)曲通X - 1 0 0则同样增加其子叶出苗百分率和每子叶出苗数。但是 ,这些幼苗未能发育至成熟。另外 ,附加曲通 0 .0 1 % - 0 .5% (V/V)未能诱导子叶再生。这些结果表明表面活性剂的亲水 -疏水 (HLB)间的平衡决定外植体细胞的渗透特性 ,从而影响其形态建成。 | A.khatun Mr.davey JB.Porver 赵立宁 臧巩固 | 2001 | 中国麻业2001，23，3： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员