共被期刊论文引用了3次
您的检索式：您选中1篇文献正在查看引证文献汇总
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | 国内外二语研究元分析新进展(2010-2019)显示文摘元分析是借助统计手段对某研究领域一手研究进行系统性综述的方法,其目的是充分考虑抽样误差和无显著统计学意义的结果,避免情感、记忆等主观因素引发的分析疏漏。本文回顾梳理2010-2019年SSCI和CSSCI来源期刊的二语研究元分析论文,得到以下发现:近十年元分析主题多元,涉及二语阅读、二语词汇、二语语法、二语口语、二语写作、二语策略、计算机辅助语言学习等;数据分析工具主要是CMA;多数研究合并标准均差Cohen’s d效应量,部分研究计算Hedge’s g来纠正小样本偏误,少数研究合并Pearson’s r效应量。本文的分析结果对二语研究元分析发展和外语教学具有一定启示意义。 | 申云化 张军 | 2020 | 外语界2020，，3： | 5 |
| 2 | 效应量在外语研究独立样本T检验中的应用及意义显示文摘统计上的显著意义不能等同于实验结果的实际意义显著。效应量可来辅助评价研究结果的实际意义大小。通过对33个独立样本T检验研究效应量的计算分析,建议外语研究者重视对效应量的研究与运用,并进一步开展元分析研究。 | 秦学锋 杨东益 杨东英 | 2014 | 工业技术与职业教育2014，12，3： | 2 |
| 3 | Review of Research on Learning and Instruction with Specific Reference to Reading Chinese as an Additional Language(1976−2018)显示文摘This review,which can be seen as a scoping review,highlights 92 empirical studies about the learning and instruction of reading Chinese as an additional language(CAL)published in English between 1976 and 2018.It first identifies and evaluates the trends of CAL reading research over the past four decades,including the developmental trajectory of the field,topics that are hot versus those not-so-hot,populations that are widely studied versus under studied,research methods adopted in the selected studies,and the most widely cited articles.Second,the review examines direct evidence that supports effective practices of CAL reading instruction and explores two tracks of studies:high-evidence versus low-evidence practices.This review concludes with thoughts on the future directions of CAL reading research inspired by trends in the areas of literacy,second language acquisition(SLA),and teaching Chinese as a second/foreign language(TSCL/TCFL).To be specific,there is a need for the field to pay equal attention to learning to read and reading to learn. | Sihui(Echo)KE | 2020 | Frontiers of Education in China2020，15，1： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员