共被期刊论文引用了3次
您的检索式：您选中1篇文献正在查看引证文献汇总
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Clinical study of anesthetization by dezocine combined with propofol for indolent colonoscopy显示文摘AIM: To assess the use of dezocine combined with propofol for the anesthetization of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy in the Xinjiang people's Hospital was conducted from April 1 to April 30, 2015. The survey collected patient general information and anesthesia data, including overall medical experience and pain management. Thirty minutes after colonoscopy surgery, samples of venous blood were collected and the biochemical indicators of gastrointestinal function were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 98 female and 62 male respondents. Indolent colonoscopy was found to be more suitable for mid to older-aged patients. The necessary conditions for the diagnosis of digestive diseases were required in 65 of the 73 inpatients. Adverse reactions to the intraoperative process included two cases of body movement and two cases of respiratory depression. Gastrin and vasoactive intestinal peptide levels were slightly increased. However, somatostatin and endothelin levels were slightly decreased. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that dezocine combined with propofol can be successfully used for the anesthetization of indolent colonoscopy patients without pain and should be widely used. | Bin-Bin Xu Xiao-liang Zhao Gui-ping Xu | 2016 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2016，22，24： | 23 |
| 2 | 肺叶切除患者应用咪达唑仑联合地佐辛麻醉的临床观察显示文摘目的探讨对肺叶切除患者予以咪达唑仑(MID)联合地佐辛(DEZ)麻醉的临床有效性。方法选择120例择期行肺叶切除手术且采用胸椎旁阻滞麻醉方式的患者,按随机数字表法分为生理盐水组(N组)、咪达唑仑组(M组)、地佐辛组(D组)和咪达唑仑+地佐辛组(M+D组),每组30例。患者在T0(给药前)、T1(给药后5 min)、T2(椎旁阻滞时)、T3(椎旁阻滞后10 min)4个时间点分别采取常规方法对有创平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、脑电双频指数(BIS)、血氧饱和度(SpO_2)进行测定,并对本次镇静效果进行评价。结果与N组相比较,T1~T3时(M+D)组患者MAP明显下降(P<0.05),且显著低于M组和D组(P<0.05);T1~T3时,(M+D)组患者HR下降明显(P<0.05);与N组相比较,M组、D组和(M+D)组患者的BIS均有下降(P<0.05),且与T0相比较,T1~T3时(M+D)组患者的BIS下降明显(P<0.05),且显著低于M组和D组(P<0.05);T1~T3时,4组患者SpO_2差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与N组相比较,其他3组患者OAA/S评分均显著上升(P<0.05),且(M+D)组明显高于M组和D组(P<0.05),T1~T3时,4组患者VAS评分进行比较,(M+D)组患者VAS下降最明显(P<0.05)。结论在肺叶切除手术中予以患者咪达唑仑联合地佐辛麻醉,患者术中镇静及镇痛效果良好。 | 何军 洪燕 郭超 董彦海 刘会彬 | 2018 | 河北医药2018，40，17： | 4 |
| 3 | 经腹子宫全切术患者不同剂量右美托咪啶硬膜外麻醉镇静效果观察显示文摘目的:观察不同剂量右美托咪啶在硬膜外麻醉经腹子宫全切术中的镇静效果和安全性。方法:硬膜外麻醉经腹子宫全切术择期患者120例随机分为4组,即不同剂量右美托咪啶镇静组(D1组,D2组,D3组)和咪达唑仑镇静组(M组)。D1组、D2组、D3组在手术前10 min静脉泵注右美托咪啶0.5 μg·kg-1,随之分别以0.4,0.6,0.8μg·(kg·h)-1维持输注;M组患者在手术前10 min静脉泵注咪达唑仑0.06 mg·kg-1,随之以0.04 mg·(kg·h)-1维持输注。比较各组患者入室时(T0)、确定硬膜外麻醉阻滞效果满意时(T1)、镇静药物泵注后10 min(T2)、20 min(T3)、40 min(T4)、手术结束时(T5)的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)和血氧饱和度(SpO2),以及镇静药物使用时间和手术时间。评估各时点镇静程度,及术后患者手术期间遗忘程度、药品不良反应和麻醉服务满意度。结果:T3时点后,D3组HR显著低于其余3组(P<0.05);T2时点后,4组HR均明显低于T0时(P<0.05和P<0.01)。M组T3、T4时点RR显著低于其余3组(P<0.05)。与T0时比较,T2时点后,各组患者均取得显著镇静效果(P<0.05和P<0.01);D3组T3、T4时镇静评分显著优于D1组和M组(P<0.05)。4组患者均未出现明显药品不良反应。结论:硬膜外麻醉经腹子宫全切术应用右美托咪啶维持镇静无类似输注咪达唑仑后发生呼吸抑制的风险,但剂量宜低于0.8μg·(kg·h)-1。 | 万芳 余奇劲 肖兴鹏 陶红 | 2014 | 中国药师2014，17，10： | 2 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员