维普中文期刊产品整合服务
共被期刊论文引用了9次 您的检索式:您选中1篇文献正在查看引证文献汇总
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1海水养殖生态系统健康综合评价:方法与模式显示文摘我国海水养殖业快速、大规模发展的同时给生态系统带来巨大的压力,养殖自身的健康和持续发展也受到影响。为了评估海水养殖生态系统所承受的环境压力、系统的状态和发展趋势,以海湾养殖生态系统为典型,根据系统性、动态性、生态-社会-经济相结合的原则,构建了基于指标体系法和层次分析法的海水养殖生态系统健康综合评价的方法与模式,以期为养殖海域生态系统健康评估和适应性管理提供科学工具。蒲新明 傅明珠 王宗灵 张新军 2012生态学报2012,32,19:19
2近海生态系统健康状况评价的研究进展显示文摘在可持续发展观的推动下,水域生态系统健康问题已引起各界的广泛重视.其中,河流、湖泊等水域的健康评价已开展很多,但对近海生态系统健康的研究还处于探讨阶段.本文在调研国内外大量文献的基础上,对近海生态系统健康的概念进行辨析,总结了近海生态系统健康状况评价的方法、指标筛选原则和研究思路等,并系统地列举了近海生态系统状况健康评价的一些相关量化指标.最后,针对目前近海生态系统健康研究领域存在的主要问题,提出了近海生态系统健康研究的发展方向,认为今后开展近海生态系统健康状况评价研究还需在概念及内涵剖析、评价指标筛选、评价尺度选取和评价方法集成等方面进一步加强.戴本林 华祖林 穆飞虎 徐宁 贺玉龙 2013应用生态学报2013,24,4:12
3基于GIS/RS的海岸带生态环境变化研究综述显示文摘近年来,随着沿海地区经济建设的脚步的不断加快,人们逐渐加大了对海岸带环境资源的开发利用。海岸带填海造陆、滩涂围垦等人类活动的增多使得区域生物及非生物物质发生了剧烈的改变,进而对海岸带生态环境产生了重要的影响。基于此,各国学者尝试通过一系列的技术手段与方法模型对海岸带生态环境时空变化进行相关探究。其中,遥感与地理信息系统技术作为生态环境的重要分析工具,在区域生态环境变化的评估与监测中有着较为广泛的应用。在海岸带生态环境变化的探究中,由于研究目的、角度以及方向的不同,相关学者所使用的研究方法及模型也存在着一定的差别。本文结合海岸带生态环境研究现状,将海岸带生态环境变化研究分成海岸带土地利用/覆被变化研究、景观格局变化研究、海岸线变迁变迁研究、植被变化研究、水土环境表征因子变化研究以及基于指标体系的生态环境变化研究6个主要部分,并分别从这6个部分出发,对海岸带生态环境变化研究的技术、方法与模型进行归纳总结,从而提出未来我国海岸带生态环境变化研究中需要解决的问题以及重点研究方向,为今后海岸带生态环境的深入研究打下坚实的基础。聂鑫 郭瑞琦 汪晗 卢意 2018海洋湖沼通报2018,,3:8
4Assessment and regulation of ocean health based on ecosystem services: Case study in the Laizhou Bay, China显示文摘The ecosystem-based management of nearshore waters requires integrated assessment of ocean health and scientific guidance on artificial regulations to promote sustainable development. Quantitative approaches were developed in this paper to assess present and near-term ocean health based on ecosystem services. Results of the case study in the Laizhou Bay of China showed that the index score of ocean health was 0.785 6 out of 1.0 at present and was expected to range from 0.555 1 to 0.804 1 in the near-term future depending on different intensities of artificial regulation of negative pressures. Specifically, the results of ocean health at present mainly indicated that cultural services and provisioning services performed essentially perfectly while supporting services and regulating services functioned less well. It can be concluded that this nearshore ecosystem would partially lose supporting and regulating services in the near-term future if the increasing pressures were not wellregulated but that all of these categories of ecosystem services could be slightly improved if the negative pressures were fully controlled. Additionally, it is recommended that publicity and education on ecosystem services especially on cultural services and regulating services should be further strengthened. The analytical process and resulting quantification provide flexible tools to guide future development of regulations so as to facilitate ecosystem-based management in the coastal zone.SHEN Chengcheng ZHENG Wei SHI Honghua DING Dewen WANG Zongling 2015Acta Oceanologica Sinica2015,34,12:4
5A model to assess fundamental and realized carrying capacities of island ecosystem:A case study in the southern Miaodao Archipelago of China显示文摘Research on carrying capacity, aiming at maintaining the limited ability of the Earth's life supporting system to sustain human development, requires a comprehensive and ecosystem-based approach to monitor and assess the localized sustainability of coupled social and ecological systems. A definition termed the ecosystem-based carrying capacity of island(EBCCI) was developed in this paper of which the indices of fundamental and realized carrying capacities of island(FCCI and RCCI) were highlighted to emphasize the inter-dependencies between social systems and ecological systems. In order to avoid the difficulties and uncertainties of direct assessment, the related assessment model was established on the basis of synthetic evaluation of inherent and external factors affecting the EBCCI. The southern Miaodao Archipelago(SMA) located in the intersection of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea, China, was taken as a typical example to acquire integrated recognition of the island ecosystem and its carrying capacity so as to discuss its sustainable development. The index scores of FCCI and RCCI in the SMA were 0.818 5 and 0.712 9 out of 1.0, respectively, with acceptable uncertainties. The results showed a relatively well capacity to sustain progress and relatively well realization of the carrying capacity of island ecosystem, owing to a well capacity of ecologically regulating, general performance of both ecologically supporting and resource provisioning, and a relatively high level of social supporting system. The study implied that it was critical to optimize the inter-dependencies and to sustain the relative balance between social systems and ecological systems so as to improve the RCCI and further facilitate the sustainability of SMA. The approach proposed in this paper provides a powerful tool which is well applicative to the regional level of an oceanic island or archipelago to study the sustainable development and can be further popularized to the coastal zone.SHI Honghua SHEN Chengcheng ZHENG Wei LI Fen WANG Xiaoli CHI Yuan GUO Zhen QIAO Mingyang GAO Liyuan DING Dewen 2016Acta Oceanologica Sinica2016,35,2:4
6The ecological cost of land reclamation and its enlightenment to coast sustainable development in the northwestern Bohai Bay,China显示文摘Land has been widely reclaimed in large area in coastal zones all over the world to relieve the pressure of land shortage,promoting social development and economic growth.Asia has become a focus of land reclamation with the rapid industrialization and urbanization.From the Binhai New Area of Tianjin to the Caofeidian New Area of Tangshan,the undergoing project of land reclamation on the northwest coast of Bohai Bay,China,is the largest in the world.To clarify the environmental issues and benefit sustainable development of the coastal zone,we conducted both retrospective and predictive assessments of the ecological cost caused by land reclamation on the northwest coast of Bohai Bay,China.We calculated the ecological costs of ten aspects of the four ecosystem services,i.e.,supply,regulation,support and culture,with the monetary estimate approach.The results indicate that the ecological cost of the new land reclamation is US$971.9 million from 2000 to 2010 and that the cost will be US$702.1 million from 2010 to 2020.The costs of gas regulation and marine food supply account for the greatest parts of the total value.Suggestions for land reclamation oriented to sustainable development in the study area are put forward,including a rational planning based on the comprehensive evaluation,reducing the amount of land reclamation area,optimizing the structure of the reclaimed land,reclaiming land with the concept of 'low impact development' and implementing ecological compensation mechanisms,etc.ZHU Gaoru XU Xuegong WANG Hui LI Tuoyu FENG Zhe 2017Acta Oceanologica Sinica2017,36,4:4
7天津牡蛎礁特别保护区生态系统健康研究显示文摘随着海岸带开发的不断增强,天津市大神堂牡蛎礁海洋特别保护区的生态环境面临严重威胁。为了全面准确地表述该区域的生态状况,充分考虑牡蛎对重金属的生物富集作用、保护区生态系统的脆弱性及捕捞行为对牡蛎可持续增长的重要影响,构建了牡蛎礁特别保护区生态系统健康评价体系,并基于模糊综合模型对该区域的生态系统健康进行了评价和研究。结果表明,特别保护区的底质与水体处于健康状态,生物环境和捕捞压力处于不健康状态,整体健康状态不容乐观;在时空分布状态上,存在远海优于近岸、南部优于北部,并随时间的推移整体改善的趋势。所构建的牡蛎礁特别保护区生态系统健康评价体系是对现有评价体系的有益改进和补充。徐晓甫 王群山 郑德斌 高燕 郭彪 2018水力发电学报2018,37,3:3
8基于可拓分析与组合赋权法的乐清湾生态系统健康评价显示文摘借助GIS和RS技术,结合数字影像数据、社会经济数据和环境监测数据,运用PSR模型分别从陆源压力、环境状态和生物响应3个方面选取18项指标构建乐清湾海湾生态系统健康评价综合指标体系,并利用可拓分析和组合赋权法对乐清湾生态系统健康现状进行综合评价.研究结果表明:春季和夏季乐清湾全湾生态系统健康水平分别呈极差和中等状态,夏季优于春季,整体生态系统健康状况不容乐观.春季乐清湾生态系统健康水平内湾、中湾和外湾分别为极差、优秀和极差,并在空间上呈现出中湾最好,内湾次之,外湾最差的趋势;夏季乐清湾生态系统健康水平内湾、中湾和外湾分别为中等、优秀和中等,健康水平明显优于春季,并在空间上呈现出中湾优于外湾,内湾最差的趋势.人口密度、单位面积COD排放量、自然岸线保持率、有机污染指数、营养水平指数、底栖生物多样性指数和春季初级生产力是制约乐清湾生态系统健康的主要因素.为了改善乐清湾生态系统健康,应加强土地利用监督管理,控制海水养殖强度,提高生活污水处理率,建立湿地自然保护区,同时发展海洋观光旅游等绿色产业.解雪峰 蒋国俊 吴涛 边华菁 张勇 2016环境科学学报2016,36,6:2
9近海生态系统健康的内涵及表征显示文摘针对目前对近海生态系统健康定义仍较为模糊的状况,在调研国内外大量文献的基础上,重新解析与定义了近海生态系统健康的概念,进一步拓展了包含生态服务功能以及社会经济功能两方面的近海生态系统健康研究内容,并识别出水质理化参数、生物指标、沉积物环境指标、生物残毒指标、生态系统服务功能指标以及社会经济指标是目前使用较为频繁的6类表征近海生态系统健康状况优劣的指标,同时指出针对不同管理要求、不同区域特征、不同人类活动影响以及不同功能区划的近海生态系统,其健康表征指标应有所差异和取舍。戴本林 穆飞虎 徐宁 朱安峰 2013安全与环境工程2013,20,5:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费