|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Proton pump inhibitor for non-erosive reflux disease:A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy,safety and influential factors of proton pump inhibitor(PPI)treatment for non-erosive reflux disease(NERD).METHODS:PubMed,MEDLINE,EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2013 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials(RCTs)that probed into the efficacy,safety and influential factors of PPI treatment for NERD.The rates of symptomatic relief and adverse events were measured as the outcomes.After RCT selection,assessment and data collection,the pooled RRs and 95%CI were calculated.This meta-analysis was performed using the Stata 12.0 software(Stata Corporation,College Station,Texas,United States).The level of evidence was estimated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation system.RESULTS:Seventeen RCTs including 6072 patients met the inclusion criteria.The results of the metaanalysis showed that PPI treatment was significantly superior to H2receptor antagonists(H2RA)treatment(RR=1.629,95%CI:1.422-1.867,P=0.000)and placebo(RR=1.903,95%CI:1.573-2.302,P=0.000)for the symptomatic relief of NERD.However,there were no obvious differences between PPI and H2RA(RR=0.928,95%CI:0.776-1.110,P=0.414)or PPI and the placebo(RR=1.000,95%CI:0.896-1.116,P=0.997)regarding the rate of adverse events.The overall rate of symptomatic relief of PPI against NERD was 51.4%(95%CI:0.433-0.595,P=0.000),and relief was influenced by hiatal hernia(P=0.030).The adverse rate of PPI against NERD was 21.0%(95%CI:0.152-0.208,P=0.000),and was affected by hiatal hernia(P=0.081)and drinking(P=0.053).CONCLUSION:PPI overmatched H2RA on symptomatic relief rate but not on adverse rate for NERD.Its relief rate and adverse rate were influenced by hiatal hernia and drinking. | Ji-Xiang Zhang Meng-Yao Ji Jia Song Hong-Bo Lei Shi Qiu Jing Wang Ming-Hua Ai Jun Wang Xiao-Guang Lv Zi-Rong Yang Wei-Guo Dong | 2013 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2013，19，45： | 8 |
| 2 | 不同亚型胃食管反流病食管黏膜下层炎症因子变化特点研究显示文摘目的分析3种亚型胃食管反流病患者与对照组食管黏膜的组织变化和局部IL-4、IL-6表达,探讨Th2型炎症因子在胃食管反流病发生发展中的作用。方法选取2016年12月至2017年12月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院69例患者临床资料,根据Gerd Q评分和内镜结果将所有入选研究者分为Barrett食管(BE)、糜烂性食管炎(EE)、非糜烂性反流病(NERD)和对照4组,利用食管24 h pH监测法评价胃食管反流病(GERD)患者食管酸暴露及反流特点;通过食管组织HE染色进行组织病理学评分,使用免疫组化法和酶联免疫吸附剂测定法检测食管局部及血清中IL-4、IL-6表达情况。结果食管24 h pH监测结果中,3亚组间DeMeester指数、弱酸反流次数、反流总事件数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),NERD组酸反流次数较其余2组低,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);4组样本食管黏膜组织病理学评分中发现,BE组、EE组与其余2组相比均明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),BE组与EE组评分之间亦有显著差异(P<0.05),NERD组与对照组间差异不明显;IL-4在4组食管标本中均有不同程度表达,但4组间IL-4阳性率的比较并无显著差异(P均>0.05);IL-6在NERD组和对照组表达量较低甚至不表达,EE组IL-6阳性率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),但与NERD组间无显著差异,BE组阳性率与对照组和NERD组之间均有明显差异(P均<0.05)。结论 GERD食管黏膜上皮组织学炎症等级随食管炎的恶化而升高,其中NERD的食管组织学已出现炎性化趋势,但尚不足以与正常食管区别;IL-4在不同亚型GERD食管黏膜组织中的表达差异不及IL-6显著。 | 吾布力卡斯木·吾拉木 巴突尔·艾克木 买买提·依斯热依力 刘晓勇 克力木·阿不都热依木 | 2018 | 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志2018，5，3： | 5 |
| 3 | Barrett食管、糜烂性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病食管酸暴露及食管动力学分析显示文摘目的分析胃食管反流病(GERD)三种亚型Barrett食管(BE)、糜烂性食管炎(EE)和非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者食管24h pH监测与高分辨率食管测压结果,探讨不同亚型胃食管反流病食管酸暴露及动力学变化特点。方法收集2015年12月至2017年12月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院接受住院治疗的90例GERD患者的临床资料,其中BE组28例、EE组35例、NERD组27例,通过食管24h pH监测结果评价患食管酸暴露及反流特点,高分辨率食管测压检查评价食管动力学特点。结果 3组患者年龄及身体质量指数(BMI)等一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);EE组患者24 h食管pH监测中pH≤4(酸反流)、4 0. 05);3组Demeester评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);LES长度3组无明显差异,BE组LES静息压及残余压较EE组和NERD组稍高,但差异无统计学意义(P均>0. 05);3组在食管远端收缩积分比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论食管测酸检查在GERD临床亚型的鉴别方面并无显著差别;Barrett食管、糜烂性食管炎、非糜烂性反流病均存在抗反流屏障功能减退,但不同程度的食管粘膜损伤对食管动力学的影响并无差异。 | 美丽克扎提.安扎尔 米热阿依.阿不都哈的尔 高峰 | 2018 | 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志2018，5，2： | 2 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员